1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sinclair buys Fox Sports regional networks

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Jake from State Farm, May 4, 2019.

  1. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Private equity strikes again.

    They took yet another business that would be a cash cow in any normal world. ... but zero interest rate policy made it ripe for financialization. With each changing of hands, it got loaded up with more debt to make a series of sales possible. Now it is drowning in $8 billion of debt that relied on interest rates remaining at almost zero interest forever so they could keep rolling the debt over. But interest rates are rising and that debt is severely distressed and default is looming.

    Unless that changes, Sinclair will be the one left holding the bag.

    What is so frustrating about it is that it's not like this is an unviable business. Once someone eats all of that debt, it will emerge on the other side as a cash cow, with the leagues (if they are the buyers) being the beneficiaries. And that will likely mean that it will end up costing fans.
     
    FileNotFound likes this.
  2. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    I can't watch three local professional teams because Sinclair held the provider hostage, and has for the past three years.

    The leagues realized they are losing in the long run because people aren't watching because they can't.

    They'll come out ahead with agreements that will still make billions, just not sucking up every last dollar like Sinclair was doing.
     
    maumann, 2muchcoffeeman and dixiehack like this.
  3. Octave

    Octave Well-Known Member

    It sounds a little like the CBS baseball contract, which happened at a bad time for the economy and for the economics of the game.
     
  4. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    It doesn’t have to do with rising interest rates. It has to do with investors repeatedly pulling money out of the company and saddling someone else with the burden.

    Greed. But how do you fix it? No clue.

    It’s a crappy way to do business, but I also don’t feel bad for those big investors left holding the bag — they knew it could blow up at any second and made the deals anyway. I do feel bad for the individual investors who are affected by this nonsense.
     
  5. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Ragu’s contention is that kind of approach only works when interest rates are low enough that cheap borrowing costs make it look attractive for the raiding companies.
     
    doctorquant likes this.
  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    This is what private equity has been doing since the financial crisis. ... and if the Fed keeps raising rates, people are going to become intimate with what was going on, the same way they learned about credit default swaps on mortgages in 2008. This time, the malinvest permeates way more things. ... but it is particularly ugly in corporate leveraged loans, which have been the domain of private equity.

    The simplistic script:

    1) You find a healthy business, one that isn't growing that fast, but which has a real business with real revenue and income. A lot of it has been in manufacturing, but something like these regional sports networks was prime for it, because they are great businesses.

    2) Artificially low borrowing rates incentive private equity firms to borrow heavily to buy those businesses. They leave the debt on the balance sheet of the company, saddling it with debt. And then try to flip the company within five years by making it more profitable (which entails cutting costs aggressively).

    3) They sell the business for a healthy profit, and in many cases, these are businesses that have been flipped muliple times this way, with each step of the way leaving the business with more debt.

    4) Because savers are being robbed of safe yield, the artificially suppressed interest rates push pension funds, insurance companies and pretty much everyone else into riskier and riskier investments, and that has sent the leveraged-loan market soaring. That is where the loans to these businesses have been being repackaged, much the way that mortgages were being repackaged the last time around.

    5) It's all great. ... as long as these businesses are able to keep rolling the loans over when they come due (unlike a mortgage, when your corporate loan comes due, you either need to repay all of the principle at once or roll it over into a new loan). With interests rates having been artificially pinned near zero for hte last 13 years, that has been no problem. For the most part, these businesses have been struggling under the weight of their debt, but they are able to make their interest payments because they are so low and when the loans were due, they were able to refinance with loans that have had very few covenants (so no lender protection, another consequence of the rate manipulation that has forced people into riskier behavior).

    6) The problem now? Rates are rising. And there is rot waiting to be exposed. In the case of these RSNs, Diamond Sports Group (the subsidiary of Sinclair that owns these RSNs) has $8 billion in debt from the sale from ESPN. And rising rates have created a crisis. They already took a write down of several billion dollars when the pandemic shut down the sports leagues and they weren't earning. ... now they can not just roll over their loans with very little interest due. And they can't afford the borrowing costs now. They are going to drown in their debt. That is why the business is going to sell for way less than what they paid for it. They are getting stuck holding the bag. It was going to happen at some point. Unless the Fed pivots and rates come back down to zero, that $8 billion in debt is an albatross, and with anything above ZIRP (zero interest rate policy), it is untenable. I suspect the world is close to finding out just how much of this there is out there. At some point, it is a certainty.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2022
    TigerVols and maumann like this.
  7. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Yes, but if businesses didn't approach it that way, this wouldn't be an issue.

    I do wish there were a way we could stop that, but a.) this is capitalism and you take the good with the bad and b.) I'll defer to much smarter and more informed people.
     
    maumann likes this.
  8. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    It's not an issue with capitalism. You can't have free-market capitalism, when the most important price in an economy-- the price of money -- is being administered by an appointed czar who is powered by a government-enforced monopoly. Interest rates are prices. When that price is subject to price controls instead of being arrived at via price discovery in a free market, the distortions those price controls create (like overly indebted companies on the back of the mispriced debt) are not an issue with capitalism.
     
  9. Mr._Graybeard

    Mr._Graybeard Well-Known Member

    One basic characteristic of capitalism is that it will work to subvert government policy to meet its ends. Low interest rates were designed to save the upper tier of the economy from itself. They really didn't do much for the average paycheck stiff beyond inflating his/her retirement account, assuming they have one. Low interest rates are a boon for the capitalists, i.e., people with capital, who have the means to buy the government that will fulfill their desires.
     
  10. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Free-market capitalism is the one economic system that keeps the state out of private economic activity.

    It's beyond absurd to say that a "basic characteristic" of capitalism. ... is some corrupt perversion of capitalism that is actually the opposite of capitalism --with the state, price-fixing the interest rate markets (not allowing them to operate privately and freely), and people subsequently buying outcomes from that price-fixing authority to benefit themselves.
     
  11. Mr._Graybeard

    Mr._Graybeard Well-Known Member

    Please. The oligarchy owns government in this country, like all others.
     
    FileNotFound, Mr. Sluggo and Octave like this.
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Even if that was true. ... an oligarchic government isn't "a basic characteristic" of capitalism.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page