Slut shaming in the Buffalo News?

But you're quite sure the woman believes she was raped.

 

Based upon the sequence, as we know it to this point, yes. And subject to change, as I've said all along. It's possible, though probably not likely, that she is either lying or delusional.

 

This caught me off guard. I thought they closed the case after your three buddies declared she was only in it for the money.

 

You understand that I was not using that anecdote as support for the theory that she was in it for the money, correct?

 

The bar owner is currently re-formulating his story from "she was desperate to fuck him" to "see? He didn't even fuck her." Check the Buffalo News for this breaking update.

 

Someone in the story also notes that it's possible he didn't finish, and therefore didn't leave any DNA. That seems like a distinct possibility, as well, considering:

1. He probably had some beers in him;
2. Another possibility: Assuming he proceeded without consent, she finally got him to stop and he finally complied.

 

1. When has that ever stopped you?
2. You seem to run these scenarios in an endless loop in your head.

 

What can I say? It's interesting stuff.

 

There are at least 100 other places he could've blown it other than in the few square inches in the immediate vicinity of her ladyparts.

 

Possibly her shoulders, apparently.

 

I'm not going to delve into the minutia of all of this, but my guess is he wore a condom. He may or may not be a rapist, but I'd say it's pretty close to definite that he didn't want to impregnate anyone that night.

 

We all know how difficult accurate rape statistics can be to formulate, but this study says condoms are used 11 to 15 percent of the time:

Study examines condom use during sexual assaults