1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

So. Who wins the Heisman?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by LongTimeListener, Nov 23, 2013.

?

Pick the Heisman winner.

  1. Jameis Winston

    22 vote(s)
    34.4%
  2. Johnny Manziel

    4 vote(s)
    6.3%
  3. Marcus Mariota

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. AJ McCarron

    28 vote(s)
    43.8%
  5. Other

    10 vote(s)
    15.6%
  1. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    Well, then.

    That kind of shoots your hard-on in the ass.

    Or something like that.
     
  2. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    That doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of terrible voters out there. Does that mean they shouldn't have a vote? I mean....Dick's right. If you narrow the voting field, the idiots who are leftover will begin to infect the entire process and it would likely lead to terrible results. So more voters are probably a good thing despite my irrational hatred for a lot of them. For now, it's just a minority of terrible voters who thankfully haven't affected the result.
     
  3. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    One thing about the Heisman. The most famous college players who didn't get it (Peyton Manning, Andrew Luck, Jim Brown, etc.) have tended to lose to winners who were also great players. This makes for debate, but not mass outrage.
     
  4. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    OJ Simpson should have not lost Heisman to Gary Beban in '67 but at that time there was
    a stigma attached to under classman winning.
     
  5. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Yeah, and the voters knew he'd get it the next year, which he did.
     
  6. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Which is a ridiculous reason not to vote for somebody.
     
  7. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    One of many.
     
  8. zagoshe

    zagoshe Well-Known Member

    Plus they didn't want to vote for a murderer who breaks into apartments and beats up people for merchandise.....
     
  9. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    He did that back in the 60s?
     
  10. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    There shouldn't be any undue hand-wringing over the Heisman for the same reason Winston's recent legal troubles shouldn't carry any weight with balloters. The Heisman Trophy is just a college football award. It's not some humanitarian honor.

    (On a side tangent, inclusion in the Baseball Hall of Fame is not a humanitarian honor, either. Just in case some of THOSE balloters are floating around here.)
     
  11. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    Agree. It's really not a huge deal. I do admit that while I believe it's not a big deal, I'm still riveted by the entire thing. Mostly annoyed. But riveted, too. The Heisman ceremony used to be appointment television up until a few years ago. Now, you basically know who's going to win before it's announced.
     
  12. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Totally different. It's not naked moral judgment raining down upon the baseball players. Their misbehavior affected the GAME on the field.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page