Sometimes media guides can be too informative

If you remember those shirts from like the 80s that old men used to wear that said "BALD IS SEXY" in like a glitter iron-on crap.

This chic had one on at a bar the other night. God that was hot.

 

Next year's question: Top or Bottom

 

So do the rest of us. It doesn't take much effort to groom down there, so get it done. I don't want to take off a girl's pants and be staring at something that looks like my armpit.

 

I don't partcularly like staring at hairy armpits myself. I wish that was a grooming habit men would pick up.

 

Uh, yeah. Your post isn't entirely clear, but my pubes don't look like my armpits, if that's what you're getting at ...

<shudder>

 

You have some interesting breakfast table conversations.

 

It was actually while I was on the toilet.

I kid, I kid.

 

THESE GIRLS CAN PLAY, BOY

I remember it well. Tom Wancho, former SID at Northwestern State, put those steel magnolia hoopsters on the media guide cover under that banner. Hey, it was the '80s ... people were experimenting ... and no, the shaven/unshaven question was not part of the deal.

Wish I still had my copy. By now it's probably a collector's item.

 

So much for my theory about shaved softball bats.

 

Since they use metal bats and all, it didn't really have legs.

 

Not sure why there's such disdain for the bare. I personally like it quite a bit, but not for any of the creepy reasons some of you seem to have quoted. Just because it's cleaner, and believe me, it does, uhm, make a difference when you go south of the border.

On the other hand, if the woman I'm with is bare and she wants the same of me, I would consider it.

 

If husband and wife both are bare, wouldn't that be a pubic-relations disaster?