1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sporting News/AOL Fanhouse

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by mediaguy, Jan 13, 2011.

  1. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    I'm not positive that I've ever read the Sporting News. At least the magazine. I did get the Sporting News Today online newspaper thing for a couple months a few years ago, but that's really it.

    Granted, I know very little about the financials of either company, but I'm surprised this thing isn't going the other way around.
     
  2. VJ

    VJ Member

    They do solid work on the yearbook magazines they do, like NFL/MLB/NBA/NHL/collges preview, NFL Draft, etc.
     
  3. Desk_dude

    Desk_dude Member

    The IRS a few years ago streamlined the 20-question test and went with three main heading: behavioral control, financial control, and the type of relationship of the parties.


    http://www.twc.state.tx.us/news/efte/appx_d_irs_ic_test.html
     
  4. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Only way Patch goes under is if Armstrong gets fired. Didn't he start the company when he still was with Google? As terrier said, he's all in on this one (to the detriment of Fanhouse and other AOL projects).
     
  5. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    The NYT story said Fanhouse only had 40 employees and that "only" 24 of them would be losing their jobs.
     
  6. Cigar56

    Cigar56 Member

    Yeah, OK. Right now Patch is burning through $50 million-plus in a year in losses. Two or three years of that and Armstrong will gladly throw somebody else under the bus.
     
  7. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    Used to look forward to the preview issues, especially baseball, NFL and college football, but they lost a lot in baseball when they stopped using local beat writers in baseball in favor of MLB.com correspondents. And didn't they sell the periodical side to Street and Smith a few years ago?
     
  8. podunk press

    podunk press Active Member

    I've said this on more than a dozen posts, but I hope Patch works. Really. I like the concept. I like some of the sites. I want to see something online actually work financially. Desperately.

    AOL is really good at attracting people to their journalism-related jobs. They've gotten some *great* people to commit. But they have a history of cutting bait on stuff that doesn't work. It's why I would be very nervous as a Patch editor.

    Sure, we're all in danger. But AOL just has this way of pulling the rug out from under people in a Gannett-esque manner. This isn't a new development.

    And for all those affected by the FanHouse decision, my heart goes out to you. It doesn't seem fair.
     
  9. Joe Williams

    Joe Williams Well-Known Member

    At least with newspapers, we can root for them to go out of business after screwing over so many of our friends and colleagues and selves.

    Can't exactly root for the Internet to go out of business.
     
  10. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    No, he won't -- because if Patch loses another $100 million, he won't have a job.
     
  11. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    I don't feel comfortable rooting for anyone to lose jobs.
     
  12. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    I blame Garry Howard.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page