1. Coming soon, an updated SportsJournalists.com is coming. If you can't access the site, that might be why, more details coming soon!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

  3. Coming soon, an updated SportsJournalists.com is coming. If you can't access the site, that might be why, more details coming soon!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sports gambling legalized

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Big Circus, May 14, 2018.

  1. trifectarich

    trifectarich Well-Known Member

    Where is the line that separates a variance between odds at various books and an "obvious" error?
     
  2. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    That's why the state agency approval is mandated to rescind bets.

    There's definitely a gray area and judgment involved. If it's posted as 80-1 when it's 8-1 everywhere else, that's pretty clearly someone accidentally keying in an extra zero. If it's posted as 15-1 instead of 8-1, there's no logic behind how that would be accidental, so the book probably takes it in the shorts.

    There's almost nothing in the world that goes off at 750-1. That's for things like a futures bet on the Browns winning the Super Bowl. This is the easiest case you'll ever see under the governing regulations.
     
  3. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    So now, anyone... in the new states that have legalized sports betting - is it 11 to win 10 on a straight bet?
     
  4. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    yes in NJ
     
  5. exmediahack

    exmediahack Well-Known Member

    Yes. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see some -115 or -120 as rhe standard in the new states that legalize without a lot of competiton.
     
    poindexter likes this.
  6. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Minus-110 seems to be the standard in Mississippi.
     
    exmediahack and poindexter like this.
  7. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    That's the question the director at the Superbook asks -- and said they'd pay the guy. Count me as impressed.

     
    poindexter likes this.
  8. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Very fascinating argument... where is the line???

    I will say this: MANY times I have gone up to the window after making a bet, and telling them "I made a mistake, I bet on team 262 and I meant to bet on team 263" and they have always replaced my ticket, no questions asked.

    Then again, this was before the game went off; and I am betting peanuts.
     
    LongTimeListener likes this.
  9. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    The chances for errors in the in-running space are massive, both in terms of setting inaccurate lines and these types of obvious errors). I'm not sure what the vig is on these bets, but I wonder what their profits from in-running are.
     
  10. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  11. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

  12. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Just shows how much money they have to throw around.
     
Write your reply...
Uploads are not available.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page