1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sports Illustrated layoffs

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by silvercharm, Oct 3, 2019.

  1. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    Did the employees laid off get a 5-Hour Notice?

    (Slight grammar nod to them including the hyphen in their style)
     
    2muchcoffeeman and SixToe like this.
  2. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    So two SI jerkoffs lose their jobs for doing the exact thing the big bosses wanted them to do. That org is a smoking shitpile.
     
  3. BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo

    BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo Well-Known Member

    First they came for the well-compensated, well-qualified writers, and I said nothing.

    Then they came for the poorly compensated, meagerly talented writers, and I said nothing.

    Then they came for the AI bots and I said nothing.

     
  4. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    NO POWERPOINTS!
     
  5. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    Bhargava is, um, interesting, but his first move was to can a smarmy beancounter and Levinsohn's dismissal didn't come too long after that. In the company these days, that's progress.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  6. justgladtobehere

    justgladtobehere Well-Known Member

    https://www.wbur.org/radio/programs/onpoint

    It's jumping off point is the report SI was using fake reporters, but it discusses AI in journalism in general and SI's and related brands' directions in the last few years.
     
  7. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

  8. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Id argue that lamenting about SI post Time-Life is kind of like saying Craftsmen tools aren't as good as they used to be - they are merely brand names at this point with little of the DNA of the thing that made them household names.
     
    TigerVols likes this.
  9. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Craftsman is made by Stanley, whose tools I thought were still decent. And Craftsman is their top line, or no?

    (Someone should make a movie about Eddie Lambert, who stripped Sears bare and sold any asset worth anything while enriching himself.)
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  10. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Craftsman is now owned by Stanley Black & Decker. When Sears owned it, manufacturing was farmed out to various manufacturers. Now it’s under one roof, and its quality is arguably better than before.
     
  11. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    Many of these articles and blogs (BLOGS!) are working off an outdated premise, such as the Vanity Fair subhead "Can the iconic magazine regain its footing?" Well, no, the magazine can't. Weekly magazines are dead. If you want to lament how SI as a brand got to its current state, OK, but the magazine was never going to be viable in 2023 like it was in 1993. Like the old mags themselves, you have to put that part of the discussion in a box in the attic and forget it.
     
  12. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I usually throw some magazines in family stockings suitable to their personalities - didn't even bother this year. The magazine rack at the local grocery store was stocked with "special issues" - things that could hang out for a while and not get stale.
    One of the genius things about The New Yorker is that they write about things months ahead of them becoming HUGE things - globally or culturally - and they write and present the magazine so well that a dated version is as enjoyable a read as one from last week.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page