1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

survivor - heroes vs. villains

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by txsportsscribe, Jan 4, 2010.

  1. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Agreed, but I have to figure Survivor will find some way to give us another season with Boston Rob.
     
  2. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I read somewhere where Survivor was considering doing a season with all of the people who were the first ones voted off. I think they were doing this before the finally did the Fans vs. Favorites which was thrown together at the last minute during the writer's strike.

    Richard Hatch was supposed to play this season, but his Parole Officer wouldn't let him leave the country. I'll bet we see him playing again as well at some point.
     
  3. MTM

    MTM Well-Known Member

    My father-in-law has been a proponent of an all Army Ranger/Navy Seal season.

    What about all athletes, with recently retired or out-of-season pros?

    I wonder what Survivor would be like with no weak game players.

    Of course, no season will be done without hot women and hard-body men. That's why we don't get a cold-weather locals, no bikinis.
     
  4. ADodgen

    ADodgen Member

    As much as I understand why they only do hot-weather locales, I'd love to see Survivor:Tundra.
     
  5. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I'd do a "Second Chance" season with teams made up of people who were the first voted off and those that had to leave shows because of medical reasons. There have been a ton of great players who have been injured.
     
  6. schiezainc

    schiezainc Well-Known Member

    I'd love to see this. Problem is it'd be 39 days of people in Parkas going "I'm cold".
     
  7. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    It'd be great if they did it in an area where weather is so unpredictable that it could be warm one day and snow the next.

    Survivor: Denver.
     
  8. schiezainc

    schiezainc Well-Known Member

    Eh, I'm waiting for Survivor: East L.A.

    It'd be perfect, you can have one red team, one blue team and they never merge because it's immoral.
     
  9. DisembodiedOwlHead

    DisembodiedOwlHead Active Member

    The best argument for cold weather I've heard is to do it somewhere like Iceland where it's freezing but there are natural hot springs ... you'd still get the bikinis.
     
  10. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    You know, that's an interesting idea.

    I bet if anyone in television with a real social sciences bent and an idealistic hope of doing something good had any chance, they'd jump at an opportunity to try to do a sort of social-experimental type show that they think just might solve some problems, improve some societal and interpersonal ills and disprove some stereotypes -- or, at least, show that it can be done.

    It'd be realty TV, re-purposed as the new wave in creative criminal sentencing and discipline, a la delinquent-teen boot camps and wilderness-survival trips. It really could be interesting, assuming, of course, that they don't all kill each other.
     
  11. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    That would be great.
     
  12. TwoGloves

    TwoGloves Well-Known Member

    No that I ever thought he had a chance to win, but if Russell did it ended tonight. The jury saw right through his lie and you can bet Danielle will convince them if they didn't. Russell is toast. Can't believe Rupert survived.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page