1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Swine flu 2009

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Inky_Wretch, Apr 24, 2009.

  1. Stitch

    Stitch Active Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in Mexico

    My wife sent me a text from a waiting room at the local health clinic and said it's full of people who think they have swine flu. And I'm in a state that hasn't had any reported cases, yet.
     
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in Mexico

    Of course they are. Sweeps started on the 23rd.
     
  3. Beaker

    Beaker Active Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in Mexico

    Two "probable" cases of swine flu in CT:

    http://www.courant.com/news/health/hc-web-swine-flu-0428.artapr29,0,3574815.story
     
  4. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    You know, I am so tempted to post a bogus link saying that four of the Queens student died suddenly this afternoon just to see the reaction. :)

    I know this would be a bad joke, but one of the last things I want to see right now is Americans dieing because of this. That would mean, IMHO, that all bets are off and we are into the first 100 pages of The Stand. [/touchwood]
     
  5. Big Buckin' agate_monkey

    Big Buckin' agate_monkey Active Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    Let us not forget the immortal words of Mr. Homer J. Simpson: "Oh, right Lisa, there's some magical animal that produces ham, bacon, AND pork ... Likely story."
     
  6. DocTalk

    DocTalk Active Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    Just a couple of "facts" as I understand them:

    The present swine flu strain can be passed from human to human.
    The usual mechanism of transfer is droplet, that is by coughing or sneezing.
    The virus can live on a variety of surfaces for up to 2 hours.
    People may be infectious for 24 hours before they develop symptoms.
    Those with swine flu are contagious for approximately 7 days.
    Tamiflu and Relenza are effective against this strain of swine flu. It is resistant to amantadine.
     
  7. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    Like I said Doc, when Americans or Canadians or Australians start dropping like flies because of this, I start trying to figure out where Trashcan Man is. [/starttoworry]
     
  8. OnTheRiver

    OnTheRiver Active Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    OK, question for DocTalk:

    If we can make decent vaccines for this stuff -- I heard on NPR today they could have a vaccine for this bad boy by September -- why don't we have a vaccine for HIV yet?

    Both viruses.

    Both mutate.

    Why do we do so well with influenza, but suck at figuring out HIV?
     
  9. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    Because there's a lot more money to be made in not finding a cure for HIV?

    Why is there not a cure for cancer? Because it'd put a whole lot of hospitals out of business.
     
  10. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    And the fact that cancer is — in most cases — your own body turning against you in incredibly unpleasant ways. HPV (cervical cancer) and hepatitis B (connected to liver cancer) are the exceptions rather than the rule, I think.
     
  11. Beaker

    Beaker Active Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    Swine flu concerns have now cancelled school tomorrow in my town.
     
  12. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Re: Swine flu outbreak in North America

    Decades and hundreds of millions of dollars of research for...what? they can come up with a way to make a 60-year-old man sport wood for four hours and solve various other issues we didn't know were issues until the pharmacuticals told us they were issues, but not solve an issue that affects every family in the land. Why is that? Because it's more profitable to keep people alive with a bunch of shit that might work, but probably won't.

    Ka. Ching.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page