"the dark knight"/maggie g. debate

Thank you Starman.....Maggie is just not attractive, ....at all. She's actually kind of weird looking.

 

Never did understand the fuss. Extremely ordinary in my view.

 

I'd go so far as to say relatively homely.

I've liked her in most of what I've seen her in. Did NOT like her in TDK.

 

I was trying to be nice and give the benefit of the doubt, but I could easily fall into this camp as well.

 

Now that's just fucking ridiculous. She may not be Jessica Alba, Megan Fox or any number of knockouts, but homely? Come on now.

 

Sorry, Walter. Don't mean to arouse any ire.

Maybe it's better put if I just say she's all yours.

 

She ain't, I don't know, Roseanne Arnold ... but it would definitely take several beers and a long sex drought for me to give Sad Turtle much of a look in the real world. Just sayin'.

 

Have to agree with them. The magic of movies can make anyone seem adequate, but that's the best they can do with her.

 

thank you!! i truly don't get at all what some se in maggie. and yes, i saw "secretary." you are either pretty or you are not. she is most certsainly not. no matter the lighting or anything.

 

Peter Saarsgard must have seen something in her.

 

i lean more towards "homely" than towards anything resembling "attractive." she just isn't anything above ordinary.

"sad turtle" is a perfect description. wish i'd thought of it.

 

indeed, i'm sure she's smart and funny and already acknowledged she is a fine actress. but just 'cause she married another good actor doesn't mean she's a beauty.... but, hey, she's all right. [bruce springsteen]

heck, she can suck a tennis ball through a garden hose, for all we know. doesn't have anything to do with the topic.