1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Economy

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by TigerVols, May 14, 2020.

  1. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Maybe $50 of that will go to someone besides the doctor or nursing home.
     
  2. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Hard to know if they mean depending on that figure alone with no other income.

    Average 65-year-old woman will live 20 more years. $758,847/20 = $37,942, which sounds reasonable to live on if she will not have any other income.
     
  3. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    Hell, only $726,847 to go!
     
  4. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Grocery store and power bill.
     
  5. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    Left out the drug companies, which will suck up at least half of that $700K in retirement money.
     
    dixiehack and Driftwood like this.
  6. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    This is the thing that everything depends on.

    Assisted-care homes are yet another criminal racket, with most places charging anywhere from $5,000 and $8,000 a month, with costs only likely to go even higher as time goes on. It behooves everyone to stay in their own homes absolutely as long as possible because even a lot of money will drain very quickly at that rate. It is big business, and you are screwed if you have to be a client for any substantial amount of time and are not wealthy.
     
    2muchcoffeeman and Driftwood like this.
  7. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Here's whence came that Coventry Direct number ... https://www.gobankingrates.com/retirement/planning/how-much-need-survive-retirement-state/
    Lotta methodological questions, particularly as re: housing. Also, lots of right skew in the state-by-state numbers; the median is only $698K.
     
  8. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    "Only" is doing a lot of work there.
     
  9. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Seems like the average Social Security check is only (ONLY!) $1,705.79. Ouch.
     
  10. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    That $758,847 is present dollar value; that estimate will rise (hopefully) so the annual benefit would likewise (hopefully) rise.
     
  11. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Seeing as how it's 8% less than what the average is, I'd say "only" is reasonable in the context in which I used it.

    I know this is gonna shock (!!!) some people, but very often I am irritated as all get-out by economic "controversies" resting on, essentially, a willful ignorance with respect to numerical reasoning.

    For example ... how many times have you read something about how the median housing cost (perhaps it's the median monthly rent for a 2BR apartment) compares to the minimum wage? Guess what? The median housing cost is the 50th percentile ... the minimum wage is the 1th (if that) percentile. OF COURSE there's a gap ... and OF COURSE it's a big one!
     
    SFIND likes this.
  12. Driftwood

    Driftwood Well-Known Member

    TV ad voiceover: It's Toyotathon... deals like you haven't see all year, come in an enjoy the savings, you won't believe these deals.
    Me: OK, cool. I'd like to see a 2024 Tacoma. I've been sitting on a pile of cash and will pay in full when I drive off the lot.
    Toyota: Trucks? Oh no, we don't have those.
     
    SFIND likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page