1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

THIS IS CNN: Don Lemon goes berserker on Kaitlan Collins

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Songbird, Feb 5, 2023.

  1. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


     
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    People are really reaching to create narratives based on any kind of association you can latch onto. John Malone said something in an interview once before Warner Brothers was ever spun off by AT&T and merged with Discovery and. ... a ha!

    Zaslav is playing to an audience of one, John Malone?

    Zaslav has a board seat, just the same as Malone. So do 11 others, whose personal politics are all over the place. The single largest individual shareholder of Warner Brothers Discovery is Steven Newhouse (who is also on the board; quick let's find something he once said!), not John Malone. It's not even close. And there are a dozen or more institutions that own way more of the company than John Malone. Zaslav himself is a pretty significant shareholder in the company.

    I get that people have narratives written and now they are going to find every "a ha" they can that demonstrates whatever narrative they want to create. But no, David Zaslav is not beholden to John Malone. If you were creating that kind of narrative, there are people with more influence over the company than John Malone. I am not saying Malone has no influence, but "audience of one" was way off. It's not like Zaslav doesn't have one board seat vote, same as Malone, and significant skin in the game, and that there aren't much bigger shareholders than John Malone.
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2023
  3. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Both sides!

     
  4. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    This story is two things:

    First, it's a reminder that any media employee, at any time, will get the cover of anonymity in order to take down the leaders of a news organization. There are times, of course, when that's important, and in the opinion of some, this is one.

    Second, it's further proof that there's just no way to do really do this with Trump. It's one reason he can't ever be president again. For CNN to even talk to him without some 4 minute denunciation/disclaimer off the top, or spend any interview not immediately applying an on-the-spot fact checks, you're amplifying (insert adjectives and nouns here), and disturbs so many people within 99% of news organizations that this kind of story - from precisely The Atlantic - is inevitable.
     
    Azrael likes this.
  5. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    News organizations need to find ways to cover Trump. He's a former US president and a presidential candidate.

    So we have to find ways to interview him.

    That said, what Licht / CNN chose to do - a live Trump rally - is literally the opposite of the most common sense / best journalistic practices approach: a long one-on-one with a well-prepared interviewer and no studio audience.
     
    dixiehack and FileNotFound like this.
  6. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Not a single newsie/editor/boss in America has figured this out after 8 years?
     
  7. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Doesn't seem so, does it?
     
  8. Slacker

    Slacker Well-Known Member

    It's gotta be Jon Stewart. He can parry and counter-attack better than anyone, I think. And he's always prepared.
     
  9. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Shut off his microphone when someone else is speaking.
     
    Liut likes this.
  10. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    I don't love Jake Tapper. I also don't believe Tapper would let Trump railroad him in a 1-on-1.
     
  11. Octave

    Octave Well-Known Member

    I agree, way too small. I am a font nerd and thought they had the right one chosen. It does look like a goofy movie chyron.
     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Nobody needs to devise a new way to interview Donald Trump.

    It's not like there has been some failure to inform the public about who Donald Trump is, what his character is like, the fact that he lies like it is a bodily function or the long list of shitty things he has done.

    People know exactly who Donald Trump is. ... and something like 70 million people voted for him knowing exactly who he is.

    The idea that he needs to be covered better --interviewed in a better way -- starts with the presumption that if only you could show people who he really is, you'd make the idiots that comprise the country not be who they are.

    I'd actually argue that as big a disaster as that CNN Town Hall was in its execution, it was highly effective in showing Donald Trump for exactly who and what he is. *I* watched it, and I thought Trump was his usual douche self, he was ill informed and he told a lot of lies.

    Most of the people who were / are objecting the loudest to the CNN thing are really angry that such a large number of people in this country just don't care.
     
    Dog8Cats, dixiehack and Liut like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page