1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Tom vs. Patrick -- Super Bowl LV thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by MileHigh, Jan 24, 2021.

  1. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    A pirate looks at 75.
     
  2. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    Seriously, how long until Nantz just takes his Bruno Magli off and just starts beating him over the head with it?
     
  3. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    Nantz wears OJ shoes?
     
  4. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    I can see how this would've been a weird Super Bowl, viewership-wise. It was a strange year and a strange season. I'm not at all sure that everyone who would've normally followed the NFL all season, actually did so. There was definitely less run-up, publicity-wise, and excitement-wise, to the Super Bowl this year than there probably ever has been before. I know from working in my store that a lot of people barely even knew it was Super Bowl Sunday, or who was in it. I know we had nothing, merchandise-wise, in terms of Super Bowl-, or even football-themed inventory this year, and that's unusual.

    I have to admit that even I barely followed the football season this year. And yet, I was really happy to just sit down, sit back, and watch a good football game. And I did, and I really enjoyed it, despite the relative one-sided-ness of it. It just felt good, and I even sat there, thinking just that to myself. Maybe that was just because I appreciated it, and had maybe missed football more than I realized. But there probably weren't as many people as usual who did that this season. Football -- sports -- is just not what people have been thinking about, or following, lately.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2021
  5. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Viewership is down for every sport across the board since the start of the pandemic. There is zero point into reading into those numbers as some sort of cataclysmic change. To JC's point, it will still be the most watched show in television by a mile this year. I have no idea if the numbers will stabilize once people are actually allowed to gather and watch the games in person again. They will probably never reach the levels they were even five years ago because as had been noted, kids these days don't grow up obsessing over sports like they did when I was young. What the hell else did you do in the 1980s? We watched sports. We went outside to play sports. We didn't have a million channels or streaming options. We didn't have social media. We had video games but nothing like we have today. Everything has changed in that regard, so those who write about sports ratings would be wise to find different ways to define sports viewership.

    I wonder how much the widespread proliferation of sports gambling will change things. How long ago was it that you could only go to an actual casino in Nevada to bet on sports? I didn't do a deep dive on the regional SB numbers but I wouldn't be surprised if Virginia was way up there just with the recent emergence of legalized sports gambling in the state.
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2021
    misterbc and I Should Coco like this.
  6. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    No wonder Millennials don't have any wealth. They're always buying shit. :)

    Millennials own less than 5% of all U.S. wealth
     
  7. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Same as every other generation in human history.
     
    BTExpress and sgreenwell like this.
  8. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    As did every CBS affiliate that had a news show right after the game.
     
  9. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    Excellent post.

    And not only has technology changed, sports fans' attention spans have, too. I can't think of the last time I watched an entire baseball game, from first pitch to final out. It was before I lived here in the Northwest, and we moved here in 2009. I used to be a huge baseball fan.

    Even when my wife and kids "watch" sports, they're looking at their phone for at least half the time, or getting up to check on/do something. When you add the sharp decline in socializing around this year's Super Bowl, it would be shocking if viewership WASN'T down a great deal.
     
  10. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Was there anyone on the board who didn't think the game was over when Andy Reid and the refs gave Tampa Bay that free TD at the end of the first half? Well, I bet many millions of viewers came to the same conclusion and found something else to do. Look, watching the tube or computer screen or phone is ALL the entertainment option we've had for almost a year. We're both sick of it and jaded. If the show ain't boffo, off it goes.
     
    poindexter likes this.
  11. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    I thought it was Kaepernick's fault. :eek:
     
  12. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    The Tampa Bay receivers need to get a little more exposure to Division II and III quarterbacks, because they were in awe of what Mahomes was doing out there. Dummies.

     
    JC and sgreenwell like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page