Trump cheats at golf - the ONE and ONLY politics thread

First of all, Wikipedia fail.

Secondly, I don't believe you. You would never vote for a Democrat in a presidential election.

You didn't just want other candidates more. You criticized Trump quite a bit. If the Democrats nominated him, you'd be tearing him apart.

You think many more will vote for Clinton? Giving up already? Probably not what you meant, or you would have gone into hiding again.

No, I'm not giddy at all, but Clinton is the better candidate. Neither of them can be trusted. Both have quite a few failures on their record. Trump is even less qualified for the job and he chose a tobacco denier for his running mate. I forget if it was you or another of the Republican fanboys who claimed that Pence would really be running things if Trump wins and that I find even more objectionable than Trump himself.

Actually, I am concerned about anybody voting for laundry, just pulling the party lever without thinking, regardless of who they choose. Unlike you, I am being honest on this thread.

Also, I never tried to tell anybody for whom they can vote. Criticizing the choices people are making and their reasons for making them is not the same thing as saying what they can do or cannot do.

 

In the morning I'll be sober but you'll still be ugly said winston churchill to lady astor

 

Have you driven the west side hghy recently

 

The Clinton's might have closer ties to Russia
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/2...hillary-clintons-foundation-bags-145-million/

 

Another flag found at the DNC:

 

Would

 

This morning I posted a Snopes link (with no commentary) after someone posted Saul Alinsky's apocryphal How to Create a Social State on Facebook. I shit you not, the response back was "Oh my goodness....Lord forbid if something is posted on FACEBOOK without doing the 'required' research on Snopes....smh..."

If people want to believe something bad enough, the facts don't matter to them. And yes that applies to both sides (Bernie's special snowflakes come to mind) but conservatives have become the majority of those abandoning the facts in favor of truthiness.

 

Bill Clinton can still bring it.

 

Either they're right or they're not. It doesn't matter who funds them.
If they're wrong about this one, tell us why.
If not, accept that they got it right.

 

Trump sold it to the Chinese in 1997 who developed it.

Trump sold out his interests. I bet he made money, but he did by failing to develop it. Anything with his name is a license now.

 

I guess so. But either it's right or it's not. Their agenda, hidden or otherwise, is irrelevant.

 

Fox News is very, very concerned that Bill didn't spend substantial time on the Lewinsky matter.