Trump cheats at golf - the ONE and ONLY politics thread

What is more OOP? To throw in some digs around the point, or to apply a wildly flexible, inconsistent standard of proof for the purposes of being contrarian?

I'll leave that to the post-modernists to decide.

 

Real? The guy is politically connected, anyway.

 

I would say that assigning people motives is pretty OOP.

 

Broken clocks occasionally conk a sea lion.

 

Regardless of the merits (or the lack therein) of your positions in this particular imbroglio, it would probably be a good and decent thing to keep @outofplace out of it.

 

This election doesn't deserve a thread that is anything less than peak shitshow. Bring in BYH while we're at it

 

In what context can a man grab a woman's vagina upon first meeting without asking and it NOT be sexual assault?

Even if she were fine with it for whatever reason, he didn't know that before grabbing. But if he is a big star who is used to people "letting" him have his way ...

 

Why is WikiLeaks uninterested in digging into RNC emails?

 

You are adding details that are simply not in the text.

 

I wish we had a word for that. Maybe we could add a prefix to the word "text" to indicate that this information goes along with the text but is not explicitly found in it?

 

That was what I understood Trump and Bush to be discussing, meeting beautiful women and immediately being able to do what he wants because he is a star.

 

Let's not be Russian to judgment here.