Trump cheats at golf - the ONE and ONLY politics thread

Who was the one?

 

Duuuuuude.

 

This is actually a very good question, and one I've considered more than once in reading through the thread. Personally I might side with the baby but I defer to the family/doctors/current laws for now. I know that doesn't give the child a choice, but thankfully these instances are fairly rare, are they not? One of the toughest questions of this discussion for me.

 

Not lately.

 

Please explain that to the Republicans the next time they use this exact type of argument to justify the obstructionist approach to the current Supreme Court nominee.

 

Sorry. Obviously knew what he meant. Just not what it had to do with my stance. Other than a passive-aggressive way to disagree, of course.

 

Anyone who has been implanted through in vitro fertilization.

 

They also came from eggs fertilized by sperm. Shall we start singing about sacred sperm?

 

Will you defer to the law if it changes?

 

But why? I would hope you wouldn't have deferred to the law of slavery, right? Morally, I mean.

 

This is an odd sentence from the board's foremost bipartisan poster.

 

Why? Republicans are the ones making the argument and DQ does lean conservative. I don't remember him using it in the discussion of Scalia's replacement, but plenty of others from that side of the aisle have done it here.