1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

USA TODAY losing all NBA Reporters

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by dcdream, Dec 10, 2007.

  1. fishwrapper

    fishwrapper Active Member

    Suits don't sweat. They count.
     
  2. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Ha!
     
  3. Bottomline, so to speak: the suits don't give a shit ...
     
  4. chazp

    chazp Active Member

    Well put. Beat me to it.
     
  5. Joe Williams

    Joe Williams Well-Known Member

    Let's not put too much emphasis on the "voluntary" aspect of this, either. We have all seen plenty of examples where veteran people are encouraged to apply for buyouts, with not-at-all-subtle hints that their duties, assignments, working conditions, future raises and more will get nastier if they choose to stay.

    It's the old, here's your hat, what's your hurry? approach.

    Or maybe these vets are being noble and sparing some younger folks the threat of layoffs.

    People shouldn't kid themselves that buyouts aren't sad in their own right, and reflect bad times in this business. Sure, layoffs are worse. But buyouts shed good people who came in with passion and, in many cases, had it snuffed by the money-grubbers. People can tell when they're not wanted or valued. There also is much to be said for institutional knowledge and experience.
     
  6. TwoGloves

    TwoGloves Well-Known Member

    Our place just had massive buyouts. They were hardly "voluntary." Don't take one if they wanted you to and they could have turned you into a janitor or put you in a no-win situation where you'd fail and get fired.
     
  7. BillyT

    BillyT Active Member

    Either that or go back to the old days, and suddenly local Gannett papers are being told to cover NBA games.

    (I remember the days when the Gannett Patriots' story came from me (Norwich) or a guy from Burlington.) That would be, oh yeah, when USA Today started.
     
  8. Joe Williams

    Joe Williams Well-Known Member

    The main reasons there even are buyouts these days are:

    1. It's all the rage, so papers that don't even need to slash expenses as drastically as others can still do buyouts and hide behind the "state of the industry" defense;

    2. They want to shed a bunch of people at once. If they could focus on unloading one or two people at a time, my hunch is they would use the traditional make-them-miserable-enough-to-quit route rather than offer cashouts. Many newspapers through the years have been notoriously chicken(bleep) in managing veteran staffers that way.

    The basic strategy of taking a buyout seems to be, get out before they get you.
     
  9. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    What about me?? :( [/leeivory]
     
  10. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    One aspect of buyouts that I think is lost on the suits is that those left behind see talented, experienced colleagues shown the door and realize that will be them in 10 years. It's really brutal trying to try and invest yourself in the product and realize everyone in journalism is just a glorified temp.
     
  11. Joe Williams

    Joe Williams Well-Known Member

    Glorified?
     
  12. scalper

    scalper Member

    To advise a young person to continue pursuing a career in journalism qualifies as assisted suicide.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page