1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Use A Condom -- Go To Hell

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Fenian_Bastard, Oct 17, 2007.

  1. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    I, for one, am at a pretty low risk for breast cancer, and I'm tired of having to pay for mammograms.
     
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    What government insurance plan that workers pay into?
     
  3. jgmacg

    jgmacg Guest

    We're missing the central part of this discussion as regards health care and its costs. Condoms may or may not be the most effective means of birth control. They certainly are one of the most effective means of STD prevention. And our transmission rates for STDs of all kinds in this country are soaring, especially among young people, because preaching abstinence without teaching common sense disease-prevention doesn't work.

    Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) remain a major public health challenge in the United States. While substantial progress has been made in preventing, diagnosing, and treating certain STDs in recent years, CDC estimates that 19 million new infections occur each year, almost half of them among young people ages 15 to 24.1 In addition to the physical and psychological consequences of STDs, these diseases also exact a tremendous economic toll. Direct medical costs associated with STDs in the United States are estimated at up to $14.1 billion annually.

    http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/trends2005.htm
     
  4. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    Cancer is life-threatening.

    Getting knocked up, or not? Kind of different.

    Hey, I have no problem with people using condoms, pills, shots to avoid getting pregnant. Should it be mandated that it's included in a health plan? No.
     
  5. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Are you suggesting that federal workers aren't taxed?
     
  6. Flash

    Flash Guest

    Mine are free. F. R. E. E.
     
  7. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    Sure, but should insurers be on the hook for picking up some of these costs?

    If you don't have sex, well, you're not gonna die. Maybe some kittens will, but they are just kittens.

    Paying for contraception should be like paying for plastic surgery: your insurer doesn't pick up a dime of it.
     
  8. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    You know, women don't always feel that they have a choice about whether or not to have sex with their partners.

    And it's a hell of a lot more expensive for the insurance company to pay for my pregnancy than to pay for my birth control. Not to mention that every insurance plan I've been a part of has covered Viagra.
     
  9. Captain_Kirk

    Captain_Kirk Well-Known Member

    Perhaps Ms. Orr just prefers riding bareback...
     
  10. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

    Top five ways the GOP suggests you prevent pregnancy (if you must) without contraception:

    1. Sex in hot tubs
    2. Concentrating really hard
    3. Greek Love (not licensed in all states)
    4. Wide stance
    5. Mutual hostility, followed by years of silence
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I'm not suggesting anything. I was asking you a question. I didn't understand that you were talking about federal workers. That was why I asked.
     
  12. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    You wanna pay for vasectomies and tubal ligations, that's your business.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page