1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Washington or Boston

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Michael Echan, Nov 25, 2008.

?

Which city would be more fun (and less expensive) to spend a weekend?

  1. Washington, DC

    15 vote(s)
    50.0%

  2. Boston

    15 vote(s)
    50.0%
Page 6 of 6
  1. forever_town

    forever_town Well-Known Member

    That I can't argue with. I went to the stadium for one Redskins game. I took Metro. Didn't want to deal with the parking lot.

    And I also think RFK is much better for atmosphere. That place can rock with 10,000 D.C. United supporters bouncing the seats. The Jack (I think it should STILL be called Jack Kent Cooke Stadium) is about as antiseptic as it gets.
     
    forever_town, Nov 27, 2008
    #61
  2. spaceman

    spaceman Active Member

    the bloody marys at the Old Ebbitt are to die for.
     
    spaceman, Nov 27, 2008
    #62
  3. Fenian_Bastard

    Fenian_Bastard Guest

    In DC, give me the Willard for class, and The Tune Inn for serious imbibing and arguing. (Breslin wrote his Watergate book at the Tune.)
     
    Fenian_Bastard, Nov 27, 2008
    #63
  4. Michael Echan

    Michael Echan Member

    No, but they leave Wisconsin voluntarily. Just as mi madre.
     
    Michael Echan, Nov 28, 2008
    #64
Page 6 of 6
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page