Welcome to the Pac-10, Lane Kiffin

Wes Rucker · Jan 17, 2010

Point of Order said:

Wes Rucker said:

Those pictures were taken the night of UT's spring game, when Tomlin was the team's guest speaker. Those pictures have circulated around the web since the day after the spring game.

Kiffin's brother-in-law, former UT QB coach David Reaves, is also in the picture.

I find it hard to believe Kiffin would try hooking up with women while hanging out with his wife's brother. I can't say he didn't, but come on, that would be pretty messed up.
Click to expand...

Wes,

Since you're here and commenting on the photo, lemme ask you this: Do you think it's safe to say Kiffin never boinked any co-eds while he was coach at UT?
Click to expand...

Not sure how to answer that. I have no proof, and that's not typically the kind of story I chase without a damn good reason.

Point of Order · Jan 17, 2010

Wes Rucker said:

Point of Order said:

Wes Rucker said:

Those pictures were taken the night of UT's spring game, when Tomlin was the team's guest speaker. Those pictures have circulated around the web since the day after the spring game.

Kiffin's brother-in-law, former UT QB coach David Reaves, is also in the picture.

I find it hard to believe Kiffin would try hooking up with women while hanging out with his wife's brother. I can't say he didn't, but come on, that would be pretty messed up.
Click to expand...

Wes,

Since you're here and commenting on the photo, lemme ask you this: Do you think it's safe to say Kiffin never boinked any co-eds while he was coach at UT?
Click to expand...

Not sure how to answer that. I have no proof, and that's not typically the kind of story I chase without a damn good reason.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. Just curious.

Magnum · Jan 17, 2010

What's so amusing about this argument is that TV would have had the AUDIO and could have shown a picture of anything up on the screen with the audio - a picture of Lane, a monkey dressed as Lane, Bill the Mime acting as Lane, a popsicle stick with a yarn wig and a T on his lapel - and the viewers wouldn't have cared because they want the news. Pictures are and will always be secondary. All this guy needed was a little resourcefulness and he could have made it worked, yet he has to play Mr. Big Cojones complaining about how he won't be told what to do - and guess what. Lane told you you'd get nothing and you got nothing. Duh.

PCLoadLetter · Jan 17, 2010

Magnum said:

What's so amusing about this argument is that TV would have had the AUDIO and could have shown a picture of anything up on the screen with the audio - a picture of Lane, a monkey dressed as Lane, Bill the Mime acting as Lane, a popsicle stick with a yarn wig and a T on his lapel - and the viewers wouldn't have cared because they want the news. Pictures are and will always be secondary. All this guy needed was a little resourcefulness and he could have made it worked, yet he has to play Mr. Big Cojones complaining about how he won't be told what to do - and guess what. Lane told you you'd get nothing and you got nothing. Duh.
Click to expand...

It's TV. Pictures are never secondary.

JackReacher · Jan 18, 2010

PCLoadLetter said:

Magnum said:

What's so amusing about this argument is that TV would have had the AUDIO and could have shown a picture of anything up on the screen with the audio - a picture of Lane, a monkey dressed as Lane, Bill the Mime acting as Lane, a popsicle stick with a yarn wig and a T on his lapel - and the viewers wouldn't have cared because they want the news. Pictures are and will always be secondary. All this guy needed was a little resourcefulness and he could have made it worked, yet he has to play Mr. Big Cojones complaining about how he won't be told what to do - and guess what. Lane told you you'd get nothing and you got nothing. Duh.
Click to expand...

It's TV. Pictures are never secondary.
Click to expand...

Is that why people often keep the TV on in the background while they do other things? For the pictures?

Magnum · Jan 18, 2010

PCLoadLetter said:

Magnum said:

What's so amusing about this argument is that TV would have had the AUDIO and could have shown a picture of anything up on the screen with the audio - a picture of Lane, a monkey dressed as Lane, Bill the Mime acting as Lane, a popsicle stick with a yarn wig and a T on his lapel - and the viewers wouldn't have cared because they want the news. Pictures are and will always be secondary. All this guy needed was a little resourcefulness and he could have made it worked, yet he has to play Mr. Big Cojones complaining about how he won't be told what to do - and guess what. Lane told you you'd get nothing and you got nothing. Duh.
Click to expand...

It's TV. Pictures are never secondary.
Click to expand...

This statement pretty much validates my distaste for most tv folks. Who cares if it's right? My hair looks pretty ...

JackReacher · Jan 18, 2010

Magnum said:

PCLoadLetter said:

Magnum said:

What's so amusing about this argument is that TV would have had the AUDIO and could have shown a picture of anything up on the screen with the audio - a picture of Lane, a monkey dressed as Lane, Bill the Mime acting as Lane, a popsicle stick with a yarn wig and a T on his lapel - and the viewers wouldn't have cared because they want the news. Pictures are and will always be secondary. All this guy needed was a little resourcefulness and he could have made it worked, yet he has to play Mr. Big Cojones complaining about how he won't be told what to do - and guess what. Lane told you you'd get nothing and you got nothing. Duh.
Click to expand...

It's TV. Pictures are never secondary.
Click to expand...

This statement pretty much validates my distaste for most tv folks. Who cares if it's right? My hair looks pretty ...
Click to expand...

Plus, that statement is wrong. Don't forget that.

Magnum · Jan 1, 2015

JackReacher said:

Magnum said:

PCLoadLetter said:

Magnum said:

What's so amusing about this argument is that TV would have had the AUDIO and could have shown a picture of anything up on the screen with the audio - a picture of Lane, a monkey dressed as Lane, Bill the Mime acting as Lane, a popsicle stick with a yarn wig and a T on his lapel - and the viewers wouldn't have cared because they want the news. Pictures are and will always be secondary. All this guy needed was a little resourcefulness and he could have made it worked, yet he has to play Mr. Big Cojones complaining about how he won't be told what to do - and guess what. Lane told you you'd get nothing and you got nothing. Duh.
Click to expand...

It's TV. Pictures are never secondary.
Click to expand...

This statement pretty much validates my distaste for most tv folks. Who cares if it's right? My hair looks pretty ...
Click to expand...

Plus, that statement is wrong. Don't forget that.
Click to expand...

Most tv folks act this way and then wonder why they don't have print's respect - not that most care.

Flying Headbutt · Jan 18, 2010

People leave the radio on in the background, too. Meanwhile I'm trying to remember the last time anyone who decided to watch TV also didn't care if they had no picture because they at least had the audio.

spup1122 · Jan 18, 2010

PCLoadLetter said:

Magnum said:

What's so amusing about this argument is that TV would have had the AUDIO and could have shown a picture of anything up on the screen with the audio - a picture of Lane, a monkey dressed as Lane, Bill the Mime acting as Lane, a popsicle stick with a yarn wig and a T on his lapel - and the viewers wouldn't have cared because they want the news. Pictures are and will always be secondary. All this guy needed was a little resourcefulness and he could have made it worked, yet he has to play Mr. Big Cojones complaining about how he won't be told what to do - and guess what. Lane told you you'd get nothing and you got nothing. Duh.
Click to expand...

It's TV. Pictures are never secondary.
Click to expand...

"This is Bernard Shaw, reporting live from Baghdad. Unfortunately, we can't broadcast video right now of the U.S. military raining holy fire from the sky, so I'm signing off now. Good night."

Flying Headbutt · Jan 18, 2010

Hmm, I wonder which one of you posted that one.

Trouser_Buddah · Jan 18, 2010

PCLoadLetter said:

Magnum said:

What's so amusing about this argument is that TV would have had the AUDIO and could have shown a picture of anything up on the screen with the audio - a picture of Lane, a monkey dressed as Lane, Bill the Mime acting as Lane, a popsicle stick with a yarn wig and a T on his lapel - and the viewers wouldn't have cared because they want the news. Pictures are and will always be secondary. All this guy needed was a little resourcefulness and he could have made it worked, yet he has to play Mr. Big Cojones complaining about how he won't be told what to do - and guess what. Lane told you you'd get nothing and you got nothing. Duh.
Click to expand...

It's TV. Pictures are never secondary.
Click to expand...

Pictures ARE secondary.

As has been shown, you can go on the air and tell a story without video.

Try putting up a bunch of pictures with no story to back them. (photo essays not included)

Story first. Pictures second(ary).

Log in or Sign up

Welcome to the Pac-10, Lane Kiffin

Wes Rucker Member

Point of Order Active Member

Magnum Member

PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

JackReacher Well-Known Member

Magnum Member

JackReacher Well-Known Member

Magnum Member

Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

spup1122 New Member

Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

Trouser_Buddah Active Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Welcome to the Pac-10, Lane Kiffin

Wes Rucker Member

Point of Order Active Member

Magnum Member

PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

JackReacher Well-Known Member

Magnum Member

JackReacher Well-Known Member

Magnum Member

Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

spup1122 New Member

Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

Trouser_Buddah Active Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches