1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What was the best book you read this year?

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Dick Whitman, Dec 18, 2013.

  1. JimmyHoward33

    JimmyHoward33 Well-Known Member

    Favorite book I read this year was Ready Player One by Ernest Cline. I don't play MMO's but I have a pretty good understanding of the terms and stuff from friends and the book was awesome.
     
  2. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Nathan, that is a great resource. Thank you. I've really enjoyed most of these books, though "Over a Torrent Sea" bored the crap out of me and I was just too stubborn to give up on it.

    I recently saw an interview with Jonathan Frakes and Marina Sirtis. It was funny to listen to a fan try to explain to them what was going on with their characters in the books. Of course, they had no idea.

    Write, "Articles of the Federation" picks up right after the "A Time to..." series and I highly recommend reading it before "The Fall." It will be obvious why I say that once you read both.

    "Articles of the Federation" is a favorite of mine. It's kind like crossing "The West Wing" with "Star Trek," which makes it a perfect fit for my tastes. It might be a little slow for some, but it does help set up some key things in "Typhon Pact," "Cold Equations" and "The Fall."
     
  3. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    Yes, thanks, Nathan. I'd never seen that flow chart. It seems I've managed to follow it pretty well, anyway, but it will be a help for placing some of the books.

    And, just to mention, these are a little separate from and outside the timelines of the other books, but I really liked the "The Lost Era" series, as well. I recommend them if you haven't read them, for the variety if nothing else. They're very character-driven and can stand alone but make a nice series, too.

    I agree about "Over A Torrent Sea." It's one of the few Trek books that was too slow-moving, and I also couldn't stand/couldn't believe that one scene in there about the main topical character, um, wiping Riker's ass for him when he was incapacitated. Totally unnecessary and completely out of place in Trek literature. That book was a little slow but I like Star Trek enough to tolerate that. That section alone, though, was what almost ruined that book entirely for me.

    Otherwise, the character-driven-ness of the "Titan" books is one of that series' real strengths.
     
  4. H.L. Mencken

    H.L. Mencken Member

    Tenth of December, George Saunders
     
  5. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Ouch. I forgot about that bit. So much of the interaction she had with Riker made me cringe.

    Funny. I never realized "The Lost Era" was a series. I did read "The Buried Age" and enjoyed it. I may have to check some of those out.
     
  6. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Becoming Shakespeare.

    http://www.bookslut.com/nonfiction/2007_07_011465.php
     
  7. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    Paul Auster's The New York Trilogy.
     
  8. three_bags_full

    three_bags_full Well-Known Member

  9. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    You guys all only read new books?
     
  10. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Seems that's what I've been doing lately. As a librarian, I am hip to all the newest books and have easy access to them. Meanwhile, I have a bookshelf full of my own older books that I neglect. Although today I did bring home a 30-year-old book.
     
  11. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    If I read two new books a year, I'm doing good. I'm usually about 2-3 years behind. Most of the "new" books I read this year were published in 2009-10.
     
  12. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    Yes, that's what I meant by new. I'm just such a slow, involved reader that I gravitate toward classics because I don't want to waste my limited book-reading time. I figure I'm safer with books that have stood out over time.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page