Why Women Still Can’t Have It All

Without knowing Creosote's circumstances, you and the other two sure in the hell can't stereotype him as a bad risk, or the examples used as bad risks. The 1950s are long over.

 

I've read a lot of stupid things on this site. I believe that this one just possibly is the stupidest I have ever read.

 

CYRUS R StOOPID# sAY CHAPION COCKDIAN WHA

 

I'm hoping this guy is a new incarnation of McNulty. There being two of them is just too depressing.

 

I'm pretty sure it's the incarnation. I thought the same thing.

 

I've been vacillating between Cyrus Vance and Billy Ray Cyrus.

 

Maybe you people would be more successful and fulfilled if you didn't waste your time posting on a message board.

 

Where I'm at is that it would be ideal for one parent to have a part-time job or no job, to be able to have raising the child as that parent's main job, whichever gender that parent would be. That's not always economically possible, so arranging schedules to make sure the child is not left with baby sitters or in day care too much. I do think that most of the time, both parents putting career first is not the best solution. Of course, with more jobs being able to be done from home, that could be tweaked a bit.

 

Kids are expensive. I often wonder if people stop to consider that ahead of time.

 

I doubt that the innate need to continue the species has a ledger book.

 

The expense is a big reason why we're stopping at one.

 

Look at the 3 idiots you are arguing with, enough said.