Writers want a rematch, Coaches do not.

So who teams beat doesn't matter to you, only who they lose to?

 

I thought the point of the BCS was to put the top two teams in the title game...Does that suddenly change because some of you don't want to see a rematch?

 

When they are all in large, respected conferences? You bet your ass.

 

My sentiments exactly.

 

So non-confernece games shouldn't mean anything? SC beat the SEC West champ, the Big 12 North Champ and ND next week. Good wins trump good losses.

 

Ding ding ding, we have a winner.

 

Sorry, Michigan. If you're not good enough to win your conference, you don't deserve to play for the national title.

 

The team that won the confrence was the number 1 team in the country!

 

Michigan had it's chance. They lost. Fuck 'em. Put the other undefeated team in the title game.

 

And what happens if Michigan beats Ohio State by three points on Jan. 8? Then what has been settled? Are we going to go Jan. 15 for best out of three? Then best out of five?

Sportschick is right, Michigan had their shot and the three point loss was not indicative of the game. OSU beat them soundly.

 

UF, USC and MICHIGAN all have good wins.

The loss is the determinant.

 

Not a half-ounce of logic collected among you.

Jeebus.