• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A 10-point plan for the government to shore up local newspapers (From The Seattle Times' publisher)


It didn't earn any money. A company like that never exists in the first place, without distorted debt markets promulgating a survival of the unfittest environment.

The company wasn't at the whim of "mercurial tech titans." It was was at the whim of central banks disorting debt markets with zero percent intrest rates to make it so that things that lose money can keep borrowing and selling equity. And it "turned to dust," when the consequence of that -- monetary inflation -- became enough of a problem that they felt forced to let interest rates rise a little.

Without the ability to ride a monetary bubble, the company -- which wasn't viable because it didn't earn money -- ended.

Peter is kind of ridiculous at times. ... but I saw this the other day, and it is mostly correct.

 
Last edited:
I think I'll reserve judgment: Lancaster (Pa.) Newspapers has struck a partnership with its closest PBS station in Hershey to operate as a non-profit.

At least they didn't get chewed up by Gannett like almost every other newspaper around here.

WITF+LNP - Enriching lives together.
 
I think I'll reserve judgment: Lancaster (Pa.) Newspapers has struck a partnership with its closest PBS station in Hershey to operate as a non-profit.
I believe I once read on this board, "Non-profit is a tax status, not a business strategy." Do you agree?
 
I didn't realize LNP was hurting that badly. WITF is more Harrisburg-facing, at least it used to be. It seems like an odd marriage.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top