Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I started thinking about Mayor McCheese in Chicago harumphing that no Chick-Fil-As would be allowed. According to this http://www.wbez.org/black-unemployment-chicago-third-highest-nation-report-finds-100638 the black unemployment rate in Chicago is 19 percent, the third highest in the nation among cities. I would think that a few Chick-Fil-As would employ a few black kids.Stitch said:Idiot on Facebook just wrote those supporting a boycott need to think of the gay franchisees who will be hurt by a boycott. Plus, he added most franchisees were ignorant of the stances the CEO advocates.
ifilus said:
ifilus said:
printit said:Would those who are boycotting Chick-fil-A be OK with Republican led boycotts of companies that tend to lean left politically? (Ben and Jerry's, etc) How about if the right boycotted anyone that advertised on a show they didn't like. (Daily Show, etc.)
Stitch said:Idiot on Facebook just wrote those supporting a boycott need to think of the gay franchisees who will be hurt by a boycott. Plus, he added most franchisees were ignorant of the stances the CEO advocates.
This isn't Dow Chemicals making napalm or an oil company spilling its product on the Gulf Coast. They make chicken sandwiches, for crying out loud. Their CEO has a certain view on a certain social issue that in the end hurts no one. There's no evidence he or a store manager in Cairo, Ga., has fired a gay employee, not hired an employee because of sexual orientation or turned a customer away because of sexual orientation. (If they had, we would have heard the screaming). No matter how much money he contributes to an organization against the gay lifestyle, it's not going to stop a committed gay couple from getting married or having a civil union.cranberry said:Not at all. Money talks. Withholding your dollars from enterprises with which you disagree and supporting those whose practices -- environmental, political, whatever -- you align is a very effective way to make a difference and be heard. In a post-Citizens United world in which corporations can shape and dominate political discourse through Super Pacs, it seems imperative.
I don't know the person you're speaking to but this is what in general ticks me off about these social issues...and yeah we can start with gay marriage. There is too much indignant attitude in it, too much in your face, to heck with what you think PR...which is why America is polarized so much. Done in a different form, civil unions might have already found their way into culture. But no, there's part of that movement that wants to demonize anyone who stands in their way, for whatever reason. And it's why, in my mind, this if it ever becomes the law in 50 states that it won't stop with uniform legality. It will be recognized as special status.hondo said:This isn't Dow Chemicals making napalm or an oil company spilling its product on the Gulf Coast. They make chicken sandwiches, for crying out loud. Their CEO has a certain view on a certain social issue that in the end hurts no one. There's no evidence he or a store manager in Cairo, Ga., has fired a gay employee, not hired an employee because of sexual orientation or turned a customer away because of sexual orientation. (If they had, we would have heard the screaming). No matter how much money he contributes to an organization against the gay lifestyle, it's not going to stop a committed gay couple from getting married or having a civil union.cranberry said:Not at all. Money talks. Withholding your dollars from enterprises with which you disagree and supporting those whose practices -- environmental, political, whatever -- you align is a very effective way to make a difference and be heard. In a post-Citizens United world in which corporations can shape and dominate political discourse through Super Pacs, it seems imperative.
Geez, the depths some of you will go to get indignant is unbelievable.
Mizzougrad96 said:I wish the Boy Scouts actually banning openly gay kids from joining would outrage some as much as a forking chicken restaurant whose owner has political views that differ from some.
I think what the Boy Scouts are doing is reprehensible, but while I don't agree with Chick-fil-A's stance on gay marriage, I think they have a right to feel the way they do.