• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Cool science stuff

There has been a lot written lately in cosmology circles about the so-called "Hubble Tension", which refers to a discrepancy between the results of two methods for measuring the universe's rate of expansion.

The result of calculations using data provided by the European Space Agency's Planck satellite from its mapping of the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the Big Bang (which aligns with the accepted standard model of cosmology), and those using the Hubble Space Telescope's measurements from the redshift of certain types of stars don't match, with the Hubble's numbers showing a faster rate than the Planck's. But there were questions about the Hubble data's accuracy, with some wondering if dust or light from nearby stars or galaxies could be interfering with its measurements from some its more distant targets.

So astronomers called in the James Webb Space Telescope to double check the Hubble's results. The JWST has greater resolution in infrared light, allowing it to see through any dust and make more precise measurements. When the Webb data was analyzed, it showed the same results as Hubble, all but eliminating measurement error as a cause for the Hubble Tension.

https://science.nasa.gov/missions/w...3__d5nFtGFVYUcLgXA_aem_zmF60KF8phjTXbtZ2Rw57w

Webb telescope's largest study of universe expansion confirms challenge to cosmic theory

So what happens now? That's a great question. The search for answers is ongoing.
 
If it happens over the ocean, the good thing is, as small as it is, it'll be an airburst with little water displacement and all craft will be cleared. Maybe a small ripple. But cover your ears when she blows!
 
What's the problem here? All we need
is a Jew with a space laser, amirite Margie?
 
You might have heard it said how remarkable it is that our universe exists, that if one microscopic thing had been different back at the moment of the Big Bang or shortly after it, none of this could exist.

Well, a couple of physicsts, building on work by Stephen Hawking and Gary Gibbons decades ago, used a little mathematical trick called Wick rotation to calculate that universes such as ours are actually the most common possibility among all conceivable options.

Why This Universe? New Calculation Suggests Our Cosmos Is Typical. | Quanta Magazine

The math in this new calculation extends from Hawking and Gibbons' calculations that implied space itself might be made of tiny packets of stuff, sort of like the way air is made up of molecules, but it does not provide any insight into what those "microstates" could be. And its predictions are still being tested. But it could be another step toward figuring out some of the big questions regarding what all this is and where it came from.
 
Back
Top