• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Deadspin really stepped in it this time

I missed this one. Deadspin's only draw in its heyday was the replies to its posts, which were mostly just dead funny without political or social considerations. That is where we are at in the Roaring Twenties.
 
It seems like the only time people pay attention to Deadspin 2.0 is when they make complete fools of themselves, which seems to happen more and more. Their normal daily content is ignored, but in their hamfisted, replacement-level attempt to emulate the edginess of the first version of the site, they'l occasionally fart out content that's just so easily mockable. Remember when they had the Rachel Nichols news and did nothing with it, but after the NYT broke that story, they wrote a completely self-owning story about how they shrugged off that scoop?

https://defector.com/the-current-version-of-deadspin-cant-even-eat-ship-correctly
 
Deadspin's tired angst did not age well as real world problems emerged, did it.
 
I'll admit I enjoyed Deadspin and they did a really good job of building intriguing blogs that people enjoyed. There's a reason the Defector might be the industry standard when it comes to written content that drives revenue. 'The last good website'

On a separate note, OP, do you think the Kansas City child's outfit isn't racist? That seems like a tough argument to make.
 
I'll admit I enjoyed Deadspin and they did a really good job of building intriguing blogs that people enjoyed. There's a reason the Defector might be the industry standard when it comes to written content that drives revenue. 'The last good website'

On a separate note, OP, do you think the Kansas City child's outfit isn't racist? That seems like a tough argument to make.
It's not blackface, at least.
 
Calling a 5-year-old racist isn't the hill I'd opt to die on, but I am kind of a weenie.
 
I can say with some confidence a five year old didn't do the makeup and headdress.

Obviously, his parents are the problem. Obviously. But it's his face you're flashing all over your website. You don't need to ship all over a forking kindergartner to make the point that the Chiefs embrace and promote racist imagery and cheers.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top