So many coaches over the past decade are suspicious of my intentions whenever I either ask them about why a player is not playing or if they expect any players to miss a game.
"Whatchew wanna know that fer?"
I've never wanted to bust a kid in the paper, but I want to give readers a reason why so-and-so will not play. Usually I've always left it that the player will not play with no reason, unless one is readily available like "Joe Quarterback (1,385 yards, 10 TDs) is out for the season after breaking his arm against Podunk on Oct. 2."
Recently, several main players at Hometown High were all arrested at school for a misdemeaner (sic) offense committed over the previous weekend. They were all suspended for two quarters of the upcoming game, and nobody mentioned it to me when I talked to the coaches for an advance article. And of course, I wrote that they'd all "start" against Podunk that week. I even used that word or some conjugation of the verb, starting, starters...
But it's pointless to follow up on it. My ME, as other ME's in the past at small papers, they'd just say let's not burn bridges and screw our salespeople. And then there's the oddball ME that'd rip me over the coals for not reporting it and demanding that I call the coach to ask them about it only to get hung up on. And two, three weeks later that oddball ME would ask, "why aren't we getting good info anymore on Hometown High's team?"
And the cops down here, they'd protect the players from the press in a heartbeat. I could picture a deputy telling a football playing perp, "You gonna fry, bo-ah. But before ya do, yer gonna go beat the hell outta Podunk."