• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Four Marines killed in a rampage shooting, coincidentally occurring a few weeks after another one

Still not sure this actually happened. Waiting for a gun-violence update on it elsewhere and nothing. Odd.
 
I heard two reports from guarded recruiting stations today. One accidental discharge of a firearm, whose owner was ticketed for firing it within the city limits and sent home. Another guy who accidentally shot and wounded himself.

There's a reason that they don't let soldiers wander the base with firearms and live ammo, and they are more familiar with them than most civilians.
 
I heard two reports from guarded recruiting stations today. One accidental discharge of a firearm, whose owner was ticketed for firing it within the city limits and sent home. Another guy who accidentally shot and wounded himself.

There's a reason that they don't let soldiers wander the base with firearms and live ammo
, and they are more familiar with them than most civilians.

Fear of accidental discharges is not why members of the military don't carry on base.
 
The main reason that they don't carry is that they are ordered not to. That said, I know a number of guys in the service who don't particularly want everybody carrying, because they know how many of the remf's shoot maybe sixty rounds a year to meet quals. They don't want armed fobbits behind them.
 
The main reasons they're not armed are because A) they're not allowed to fire on civilians anyway, and B) if they're not MPs, they're not trained in law enforcement.

Kind of like, I'd guess, 99 percent of the "militiamen" guarding them now.
 
The main reasons they're not armed are because A) they're not allowed to fire on civilians anyway, and B) if they're not MPs, they're not trained in law enforcement.

Yeah. That's not the reason either.

They're worried about a soldier/seaman/airman going on a shooting spree, and/or purposely firing on someone, not accidental shootings.
 
Back
Top