Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I disapprove of writers who never check their content ...
Good point!
After joining, SJ suggests an intro so here goes.
Dangling modifier!
After joining, SJ suggests an intro so here goes. I disapprove of writers who never check their content, in sports when an error occurs a ref or monitor calls foul. When so called journalists err or ignore the rules, nothing seems to happen. So here I am a little voice for the people to bring attention to some of the drivel put out there just to make money. Sounds a little Snarky but necessary in this writer's view. In point of fact, see underline and red below. We do online Proofing and see this far too often online.
(" The catch came on a 1st-and-10 by Seattle at midfield and went for 34 yards, taking the Seahawks to Green Bay's 16. The Packers were up 24-20 at the time, so the catch almost ensured the Packers would end up with points.
Replay showed that the ball hit the ground as Lockett was rolling over, indicating there would have been a good chance of the call being overturned. The Seahawks ended up scoring a touchdown on the drive, which was the game-winner.)
So here I am a little voice for the people to bring attention to some of the drivel put out there just to make money.
Definition of in point of fact* so-called journalists
I disapprove of writers who never check their content, in sports when an error occurs a ref or monitor calls foul.
run-on sentence
Sounds a little Snarky but necessary in this writer's view.
Sentence Fragment
In point of fact
I just don't even know...
Should have known better.