• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Job Hunting 101: The Follow-up

Monday Morning Sportswriter said:
Ordinarily I'd say don't bother with the follow-up, but the three times I did it, I was rewarded with on-the-spot interview arrangements.

MMSW, if this is true, this is the most incredible success rate any job seeker has ever had. congratulations! that happened to me once (out of about 150 times) but the guy was talking out of his ass and the actual interview never happened.
 
Brain of J said:
What about between the interview and when the place calls you back?
If a place says they'll call you early in the week, and its wednesday or thursday, is it cool to call and ask if they've made a decision?
Then secondly, do places expect you to call and wonder why you haven't?
I've called places and have been lied to straight up. They said they filled the position but the ad was still open for the next month and a half. If it was filled they wouldn't leave it up for that long after, you'd think. Unless they did.

Yeah, that in-between period is brutal. In my experience, they usually say at the interview stage how long they think it'll take. But it usually takes longer. I typically wait until the outer edge of the time frame they gave me, then e-mail the hiring editor and, very innocuosly, ask where things stand. No harm in asking. But I wouldn't call, for the reasons above.
 
STLIrish said:
Brain of J said:
What about between the interview and when the place calls you back?
If a place says they'll call you early in the week, and its wednesday or thursday, is it cool to call and ask if they've made a decision?
Then secondly, do places expect you to call and wonder why you haven't?
I've called places and have been lied to straight up. They said they filled the position but the ad was still open for the next month and a half. If it was filled they wouldn't leave it up for that long after, you'd think. Unless they did.

Yeah, that in-between period is brutal. In my experience, they usually say at the interview stage how long they think it'll take. But it usually takes longer. I typically wait until the outer edge of the time frame they gave me, then e-mail the hiring editor and, very innocuosly, ask where things stand. No harm in asking. But I wouldn't call, for the reasons above.

Here's what I always do after an interview: send a thank you note, especially if they're reimbursing you for the trip (tuck the receipt(s) in the thank you card). Just don't put anything in it saying how you're waiting for their call ... let them think it's just cuz you're a classy, thoughtful guy.
 
JME said:
Nothing wrong with a short, easy follow up in my opinion, but I'm not a hiring editor. I definitely would stick to email; a phone call is a bit overbearing.

agree, and have been on both sides.
Keep in mind, resumes sometimes take a while to filter down from HR, if that's where they are catching them.
 
leo1 said:
Monday Morning Sportswriter said:
Ordinarily I'd say don't bother with the follow-up, but the three times I did it, I was rewarded with on-the-spot interview arrangements.

MMSW, if this is true, this is the most incredible success rate any job seeker has ever had. congratulations! that happened to me once (out of about 150 times) but the guy was talking out of his ass and the actual interview never happened.

On the other hand, if I'm doing the hiring, I don't want 50 people calling to see if I've received their resume. I think I got lucky each time.

I should amend my earlier message. I now realize that one of the follow-ups, at a paper in Connecticut, wasn't a true follow-up. I actually called to tell the managing editor that my clips were on their way, but I made the call at 11 p.m., expecting to get voice mail. I got him. (And hung up like a chicken.) I tried again at 1 a.m., and he answered again, so I sucked it up and told him I wanted to apply. I was there for an interview and two-day tryout the next week.
 
This is an interesting and necessary question/subject on the whole hiring process, but especially for writing/reporting jobs, one thing always stood out for me.

Reporters are supposed to be aggressive and tenacious, right? So why is this same process frowned upon when someone is looking for a job?

Don't pile on; I know the answer. But I'm just throwing yet another do-as-we-say/not-as-we-do journalistic dichotomy out there for consumption.
 
Is the follow-up call really a demonstration of aggressiveness and tenaciousness?

Most of the follow-up calls I've received seem to demonstrate insecurity and desparation.
 
Monday Morning Sportswriter said:
Is the follow-up call really a demonstration of aggressiveness and tenaciousness?

Most of the follow-up calls I've received seem to demonstrate insecurity and desparation.

Ding, ding, ding.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top