F
FantasyAlliance.cm
Guest
UPDATE-Did anyone see Scoops newest column where he asked which McNabb? The early season one or the one who lost to New Orleans? How can someone write that column after one subpar game by someone who was doing so amazing? Maybe if McNabb had a string of bad games, he could write something to that effect. Here it is: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=jackson/061016
He also said that McNabb was better than Manning (and according to his column, so did the guys on ATI (I didn't watch.)) It is beyond me how 8 years of outplaing McNabb could be erased after 6 games
-----------
Well, after Whitlock called out Scoop for bojangling, Scoop hasn't done anything to make it look like he has stopped bojangling. Although he doesn't ever come out and say it, his newest column (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=jackson/061011) basically accused Sports Illustrated of being racist in keeping Satchel Paige, Roberto Clemente, and Barry Bonds off their all-time all-star list.
Funny how Scoop says that there are only 3 players who are larger than the game (Ruth, Clemente, and Paige), when none of them broke the color barrior in baseball. Jackie Robinson is a much more important player than Paige and Clemente, yet Scoop didn't mention him. Must be because he was included in SI's roster, so that might hurt his arguement.
Sorry Scoop, you're the only one who is wondering if one bad game will affect him at all.And this is when the skepticism about Donovan McNabb will begin to take its toll and affect him for the rest of the season.
He also said that McNabb was better than Manning (and according to his column, so did the guys on ATI (I didn't watch.)) It is beyond me how 8 years of outplaing McNabb could be erased after 6 games
-----------
Well, after Whitlock called out Scoop for bojangling, Scoop hasn't done anything to make it look like he has stopped bojangling. Although he doesn't ever come out and say it, his newest column (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=jackson/061011) basically accused Sports Illustrated of being racist in keeping Satchel Paige, Roberto Clemente, and Barry Bonds off their all-time all-star list.
Ruth is not the only player whose representation in baseball is larger than the game itself. There are two others, and it's interesting -- funny in an oversensitive, cryptic, culturally paranoid type of way -- how both were not chosen for the picture. Or the corresponding roster.
Funny how Scoop says that there are only 3 players who are larger than the game (Ruth, Clemente, and Paige), when none of them broke the color barrior in baseball. Jackie Robinson is a much more important player than Paige and Clemente, yet Scoop didn't mention him. Must be because he was included in SI's roster, so that might hurt his arguement.
Willie Mays was black, so how can Scoop include him in this example to prove that SI is racist?How can "experts" not take Clemente's four batting titles, .317 batting average, 12 Gold Gloves, 1966 MVP, 1971 World Series MVP and World Series batting averages of .310 (1960) and .414 (1971) -- but take Ted Williams' math (.344 BA, 521 HRs, two MVPs), Willie Mays' math (660 HRs, 12 Gold Gloves, two MVPs)