Norman Stansfield
Active Member
Come on -- Emeril's from there!!!
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Igor in CT said:News-siders are totally ignorant about sports. I can't imagine them editing sports copy and knowing details that dedicated sports copy editors would know.
No, not all news-siders are ignorant about sports; some of the best news-side people I've worked with have come from sports desks.
happygirl said:bigpern23 said:Talked to a friend who said he's heard nothing there about a "sick out." He also said it is his understanding that Gatehouse is better to its employees than JRC was and that while there might be some belt tightening there, it won't affect editorial.
1. How can it NOT affect editorial when staffers are being taken off the pro beats and copy editing is being done by a universal desk? In the case of Brockton, their readers will have to now read writers from Quincy with whom they're not familiar (although some would count that as a blessing). News-siders are totally ignorant about sports. I can't imagine them editing sports copy and knowing details that dedicated sports copy editors would know.
2. By the way, to the guy who never heard of Fall Rivers, are you serious? It's a large city in the Southeast corner of Mass.
Igor in CT said:News-siders are totally ignorant about sports. I can't imagine them editing sports copy and knowing details that dedicated sports copy editors would know.
No, not all news-siders are ignorant about sports; some of the best news-side people I've worked with have come from sports desks.
Evil biscuit (aka Chris_L) said:I'm slightly amused to see everyone take David Scott's piece as gospel. He's been run down pretty good on this very board but now his word is gold? I like reading Scott and always assume that if he has an axe to grind or a dog in the fight that he makes that conflict of interest very clear. I'm just amused to see him used here (on the J-board) as a primary source.
Scott has a handle on this Gatehouse thing. What he wrote is spot on, and there's more that he didn't write. The thing about universal desks and unfilled positions and editorial people filling two jobs is spot on. And, no, I don't want some news editor who's never edited sports copy editing my copy. That's not denigrating their skills, just their sports knowledge.
And can we please get off this Fall River thing? OK, so not everyone knows where Fall River is. My bad, but it's irrelevant to the topic.
happygirl said:Scott has a handle on this Gatehouse thing. What he wrote is spot on, and there's more that he didn't write. The thing about universal desks and unfilled positions and editorial people filling two jobs is spot on. And, no, I don't want some news editor who's never edited sports copy editing my copy. That's not denigrating their skills, just their sports knowledge.Evil biscuit (aka Chris_L) said:I'm slightly amused to see everyone take David Scott's piece as gospel. He's been run down pretty good on this very board but now his word is gold? I like reading Scott and always assume that if he has an axe to grind or a dog in the fight that he makes that conflict of interest very clear. I'm just amused to see him used here (on the J-board) as a primary source.
And can we please get off this Fall River thing? OK, so not everyone knows where Fall River is. My bad, but it's irrelevant to the topic.