BobSacamano
Member
I recently went back and listened to a few interviews I've conducted for features and such, and cringed when I realized I'm guilty of saying things like, "Thanks for your time and best of luck," to close interviews. The worst is when I've published those closes on Q&A format pieces. My stomach is flipping thinking about it.
It happens on SportsCenter all the time when they bring athletes in, and I'm afraid it's an ESPN-alism I've inherited the way all writers abuse "would go on" and "would do this, that, and the other."
This isn't something I said as a rule, but it happened often enough. Now, I can see the argument in favor of interpreting it as an empty, meaningless gesture -- like "how are you?" as a greeting when you don't really give a fork. And I see how it can be a cordial way to end a conversation. But as journalists, wouldn't "best of luck" be like picking sides? Doesn't it imply that we do have more at stake than our story? I've said "good luck" to boxers doing media rounds before a fight when I really didn't care if they won or not.
Would "Thanks for your time. I really appreciate it," be a better conversation ender than wishing luck?
It happens on SportsCenter all the time when they bring athletes in, and I'm afraid it's an ESPN-alism I've inherited the way all writers abuse "would go on" and "would do this, that, and the other."
This isn't something I said as a rule, but it happened often enough. Now, I can see the argument in favor of interpreting it as an empty, meaningless gesture -- like "how are you?" as a greeting when you don't really give a fork. And I see how it can be a cordial way to end a conversation. But as journalists, wouldn't "best of luck" be like picking sides? Doesn't it imply that we do have more at stake than our story? I've said "good luck" to boxers doing media rounds before a fight when I really didn't care if they won or not.
Would "Thanks for your time. I really appreciate it," be a better conversation ender than wishing luck?