SFIND
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,005
But there are two factors which still argue strongly that Oswald didn't act alone, and they're not forensics, a rabbit hole it's easy to fall into when discussing the assassination. 1. We've had a lot of sad experience with lone assassins since then, and of all of them, Oswald is still the only one to deny it. "I'm a patsy," was his last public statement. 2. 48 hours later, Oswald is murdered in a police station. That fact is why 80 percent of the American people have consistently said they believe Oswald did not act alone. fork, LBJ didn't think so. Use the "what if this was some other country" test and apply it to the events from Oswald's arrest to his murder. Would you be inclined to believe that country's government's version of events?
Point A: Plenty of people deny crimes and say they were set up. As far as assassins, Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray also denied killing RFK and MLK, respectively.
Point B: Neither did Nixon, apparently (and both LBJ and Nixon have been linked to it by conspiracy nuts). "Something smells" is evidence of nothing.
The fact remains there is no evidence of a conspiracy.
The definitive documentaries on the subject:
Frontline episode
The second was "Beyond Conspiracy," an ABC doc with Peter Jennings. I can't find it online, but below is a 10-minute highlight video someone made and posted to YT.
Last edited: