Slacker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2017
- Messages
- 10,579
Never knew. Never asked.Why did she put it in the trash can?
She was very narcissistic, though, so
I think she just submitted her own work.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Never knew. Never asked.Why did she put it in the trash can?
I always check to see if any former colleagues won anything. Been lucky enough to attend an announcement that a paper I worked at won one. (It was my first day no less - got a close up look at the medal a few years later). And I am glad the board has broadened their scope to include magazines and podcasts. Still - the Pulitzers are kind of like the CFP, you see the same "teams" every year, with an occasional little guy invited to the table. And its only gotten worse. Used to be more than a few major metros were competitive outside of DC and NY and didn't require a local disaster to win a prize.
Still - the Pulitzers are kind of like the CFP, you see the same "teams" every year, with an occasional little guy invited to the table. And its only gotten worse. Used to be more than a few major metros were competitive outside of DC and NY and didn't require a local disaster to win a prize.
I'd almost like to see an "anti-" Lou Grant news show. Al Franken's "Lateline" was close, but could have been darker - with hosts harashing interns, conspiracy theorists making regular appearances, an exec saying "I don't care - it's GREAT television and the ratings are UP!"
My most recent full-time journalism job, I was laid off at the end of it, and between the old owners pinching pennies and Gatehouse, the reporting staff has shrunk from around 5 FT plus freelances, to 1 or 2 FT plus misc management now contributing "content" pulled from the web or AP with an occasional reporting effort. I like the two people I know that still work there, but I could give less than a ship if they somehow managed to get a Pulitzer.My old paper is one of those major metros that still pops up to win every few years. There's always a newsroom photo of when the announcement is made, back in the day you'd see a sea of people. This year it was about 10. I tremendously respect the work, of course, but the paper's management overtly craves the recognition and that's hard for me to square with how it has run the rest of the business.
I noticed this year the Pulitzer Committee discontinued the Editorial Cartooning category and added the broader Illustrated Reporting and Commentary category. The population of editorial cartoonists has been reduced so much there were not enough to support the former prize.Likewise, I won a pair of awards in the early 2010s, but even then I recognized it was partially because the field was narrowed so much. I probably beat out like 5 or 6 other submissions, not a dozen or more, like at any point previous. Nowadays, I see my older paper hyping all the awards they've won, and my reaction is, "Against who?"
You just described Fox News.I'd almost like to see an "anti-" Lou Grant news show. Al Franken's "Lateline" was close, but could have been darker - with hosts harashing interns, conspiracy theorists making regular appearances, an exec saying "I don't care - it's GREAT television and the ratings are UP!"