I understand the Wiley reference. I don't understand the Whitlock reference. If you want to take a shot at a guy, there's no shortage of actual Whitlock material to analyze. Why drag him into the (utterly ridiculous) Pearlman thing?
And as for the thread Boom linked above....Jones and Whitlock aside, it should be a case study for Psychotic Episodes 101.
And as for the thread Boom linked above....Jones and Whitlock aside, it should be a case study for Psychotic Episodes 101.