Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The SoCal group has its Lakers writer in the Orlando bubble. If the $55,000 fee by the NBA is correct, that is a decent chunk of change the group had to come up with.
So newspapers now have to pay to get access. I don't care if we are in a pandemic. That policy will undermine independent journalism now and in the future. Just look at ESPN's pseudo coverage of the NBA.
I refuse to contribute one byte to a paper that decides I'm not worth working for it. Luckily that's only happened one time so far.I was at a DFM where some people who were laid off immediately began freelancing. I understood their need to make some money, but felt it diminished the value of what we did as staffers if they were willing to do basically the same job for less money and no benefits.
Who gets the blame for that? Not the layoff freelancers.I was at a DFM where some people who were laid off immediately began freelancing. I understood their need to make some money, but felt it diminished the value of what we did as staffers if they were willing to do basically the same job for less money and no benefits.
Who gets the blame for that? Not the layoff freelancers.
Whose job is it to make everyone feel valued?
Not everyone has a choice.I was at a DFM where some people who were laid off immediately began freelancing. I understood their need to make some money, but felt it diminished the value of what we did as staffers if they were willing to do basically the same job for less money and no benefits.
But what when the fired person continues to produce content for their former employer because of his/her ego? You know, the need to have his/her opinions heard.Not everyone has a choice.
However, after many years freelancing I've chosen to retire rather than continue with the particular company in my area. I feel like it's the right thing, but who among us can criticize those who must continue because of finances?
I was at a DFM where some people who were laid off immediately began freelancing. I understood their need to make some money, but felt it diminished the value of what we did as staffers if they were willing to do basically the same job for less money and no benefits.
The one Gatehouse made me sign said I couldn't freelance or apply for jobs for their publications for two years, which struck me as excessive. Of course, I pretty much had zero interest in working for them again anyway.Some media companies' severance agreements prohibited freelancing for prior employers until after those payments ran out.
Some of my former colleagues took our institutional knowledge to the competition, which hurt. But non-compete agreements are difficult to enforce -- and it's not anyone else's business how they pay their bills.