• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Digital First pursuing Gannett

Jesus, the Arizona Republic laid off Steve Benson.

Pulitzer-Winning Cartoonist Among Laid Off at Arizona Republic

Just absurd.

I think Gannett laid off Matt Davies, who won a Pulitzer for the Journal-News in Westchester County, so there is a precedent within the company.

DFI laid off Mike Keefe from the Denver Post shortly after he won the Pulitzer. The LA Times laid off Michael Ramirez, though he won his Pulitzer while working for a paper in Memphis. So it is becoming a relatively common occurrence.
 
Last edited:
It's not so much that Gannett is sacking a Pulitzer winner. Dumping editorial cartoonists has become common throughout the industry, and that's a shame. Even if it does save a reporting position.
 
Does anyone know if the the Monterrey Herald offers home delivery inside the City of Salinas? Salinas has a population of about 156,000. I was surprised the paper in a city this size would have a circulation of less than 5,000, especially since subscriptions seem to be $12 a month. That would mean that the paper circulates to less than 10% of the homes in Salinas. Is the small circulation due to a competitive market or just that people do not want to subscribe to the paper. I know a lot of big city dailies are circulating in less than 10% of homes in the market but I thought smaller papers were doing better.

Because if small papers are seeing circulation drop below 10% then any daily in a market smaller than Salinas must be getting close to becoming a weekly. But perhaps Salinas is just a competitive market.

I don't want to out myself, so I will try to keep this fairly generic. The last daily I worked at was in a city of more than 100,000, and was in a county where the population is booming and is above 500,000. This is the only daily newspaper in that entire county. And our actual paid daily circulation was about 12,000 (and about 18-20K on Sundays).
 
From my old stomping grounds in Fort Collins:

  • Photographer Austin Humphreys was laid off. Coloradoan covers a community of 345,000 people and now has one photog for the wildfires, floods, national park, D1 college and everything else.
  • Event planner was let go (Gannett is big on events)
  • One editor was reclassified to a reporter.
  • Open position (breaking news reporter who took a job with us in Denver) was eliminated.

Sickening. We dealt with some good folks at the Coloradoan in the aftermath of the deaths of my sister and her family.
 
I don't want to out myself, so I will try to keep this fairly generic. The last daily I worked at was in a city of more than 100,000, and was in a county where the population is booming and is above 500,000. This is the only daily newspaper in that entire county. And our actual paid daily circulation was about 12,000 (and about 18-20K on Sundays).

Which means household penetration is south of eight percent daily. The reason I ask these questions is that the dogma I had always read was that smaller papers were weathering the storm better than the larger metros because small market readers and advertisers were more likely to stick with traditional print. I don't think that is the case anymore and I think closures may become much more frequent.

I may have posted this somewhere else but what shocked me was a comment I read in a New Media Investment Group, a.k.a. Gatehouse earnings call. An analyst asked a question about how Gatehouse now buying papers in larger markets like OKC, Palm Beach and Austin. Management responded by saying that there was no long enough revenue left in many small papers to make them worth buying.

That is ominous. The bloodsuckers at Gatehouse think many papers are out of blood to suck.
 
As much as I love editorial cartoons, I would think those artists can probably do okay working with or through multiple papers. They can follow local news online for local cartoons and then do national ones with wider distribution. It isn't like a local paper covers more than one "big issue" a week these days. Of course, if papers don't even do editorials or have an editorial page...
 
I think it's very optimistic to think editorial cartoonists will be OK working as freelancers or contractors. Maybe a few. I wonder how many editorial cartoonists are making a living these days doing that work for newspapers. A dozen?
 
In Central Wisconsin there are now no full-time sports reporters for four coverage areas....
 

Latest posts

Back
Top