• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gannett papers using AI for high school football

I can confirm this. In the last year every directive was to do as many lists (top 15 RBs, QBs, etc.) and recruiting stories as possible. To be honest they did return pretty good analytics, even for the small hyper local markets I was in.
That worked in my market, too. Listicles helped us keep jobs when COVID was at its worst.
 
To piggyback on the Marshall Johnson post, if he couldn't get a score from th dispatcher at a sheriff's office, he'd phone the rescue squad or fire department knowing EMS would staff the games. The Virginia AP score list would run big schools to small schools top to bottom with each clashification's scores running from eastern schools to western schools. Now it's alphabetically without regard to clashification.
 
I think AP in Tennessee still lists scores east to west, broken down by the three grand divisions.
 
Out this way I'm surprised the G papers can do anything, between Salem and Eugene I counted about 20 total newsroom staffers (editors, reporters, multimedia etc).
 
GameChanger has an automated program that produces a recap story based on a team's statistics; I believe it's been a part of the app for 10 years now.

The stories are still hot garbage. Can't identify the real turning points in a game, and the statistics it chooses to highlight are odd.
At least GameChanger adds names to its stories, if they're provided/inputted by someone. I've seen many a GameChanger box score that just had jersey numbers listed, but that's a rant for another time.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top