• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gone, Wisconsin: McGinn, Gardner leave Journal-Sentinel

That column definitely reads like they were fired. When you cut guys like this in favor of hiring someone that's 24, no experience, no sources and a thimble full of the previous talent, it's time to just quit. I'm surprised readers aren't bailing at higher rates the last couple of years. There's no way I would subscribe to most of these rags these days.

Can't argue with that.
 
I used to work in Manitowoc about 10 years ago. I left to go elsewhere, but I'm sure I wouldn't be there anymore.

Yeah, Gannett has gutted Wisconsin pretty good. I'm the most cynical person possible, but I never really thought they'd hack into the Packers coverage that way. I try and look at it from their (admittedly sickening) perspective, but what possible business sense does it make to forking reduce the coverage of the NUMBER ONE item in the state.

And I don't mean number one sports item. I mean number one item, period. People read more about the Packers here than anything. And McGinn wasn't some salary figure that nobody would notice if he left. It's like if the Packers bought out Aaron Rodgers to save a few bucks.

It's just lunacy at this point. Why even publish papers? Just get it over with.

In fairness, with MJS going Gannett, the Green Bay Press-Gazette already has at least 3 guys, so would have been 6 guys on the Packers beat between MJS and GBPG. By today's standards that's lunacy. Packers coverage is the biggest in the state, but 6 people is excessive compared to not having a single sports reporter in some areas or like Central Wisconsin two FT reporters to cover 4 markets. It really is a shame for readers and getting harder to think the print product in Wisconsin will last in Central or even GB as a daily considering when the Packers play on Sunday night there won't be anything really in the paper as they aren't changing deadlines for a sports game.
 
An article I just saw said that Gannett cut 1,000 newsroom jobs today (600 layoffs, 400 by killing vacant job). I gotta hand it to them -- they really do think big.
 
In fairness, with MJS going Gannett, the Green Bay Press-Gazette already has at least 3 guys, so would have been 6 guys on the Packers beat between MJS and GBPG. By today's standards that's lunacy. Packers coverage is the biggest in the state, but 6 people is excessive compared to not having a single sports reporter in some areas or like Central Wisconsin two FT reporters to cover 4 markets. It really is a shame for readers and getting harder to think the print product in Wisconsin will last in Central or even GB as a daily considering when the Packers play on Sunday night there won't be anything really in the paper as they aren't changing deadlines for a sports game.

Yeah, all good points.

I guess I should've re-phrased it. I knew when Gannett bought MJS, with already owning the GBPG, something had to give with Packers coverage. A couple of the GB guys went right to packers.com. Not sure if their jobs were cut when they did it, or if they knew it was coming and jumped ship.

I get it, there are other things besides the Packers, it just seems like now they're hacking into Packers coverage even more than I thought they would. That's what people here read about. I mean, even in the once every 15-20 years the Brewers make a playoff charge, Packers training camp coverage still blows the Brewers out of the water.
 
Again, not that I don't feel bad for McGinn, but he'll be fine. If he wants, he could have a job by like right now. It just sucks to get dumped so unceremoniously.

What it really forks with is the product. As Doc Holliday said, who would subscribe anymore? Again, I get declining revenues, subscribers, migration to other sources, etc. It's nothing that hasn't been talked about over and over for years. From what I know, McGinn was making six figures, so he was probably a guy Gannett wanted to cut more than any other.

But the question is: Do they even want a damn product? Just fork it at this point. I was barely hanging on reading the JS, which I loved, now I'll probably just be reading it mostly for preps coverage, and that's only because it keeps me informed on my own job and area.
 
What a shame. We all know how bad the industry is, but if Bob McGinn can be forced out of covering the Packers beat for the biggest paper in Wisconsin...wow. That's like Alabama football here.

I live in Wisconsin and grew up a Packers fan, there's simply nobody like him. We all have our biases based on where we live and who we grew up reading, but Bob McGinn has been appointment reading for Packers and NFL fans for so long. This is a shame. I tell Packers fans, "Be thankful for the last quarter-century of watching Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers and reading Bob McGinn."

This is going to sound romantic and probably corny, but it's so frustrating to see the last vestiges of "old-school" guys being shown the door. Not that other very good Packers reporters haven't come and gone and aren't still around, but McGinn was THE definitive source on the team. If McGinn wrote something, then you forking damn well cared about it.

Especially with the NFL where games are dissected 500 million ways within 3 hours of the game ending, it's rare to keep that appointment reading status. But for me and so many Packers fans, the story of the game wasn't really written until you read McGinn the next morning (or, in more recent years, at least when it was posted online at night).

He was definitely a nuts and bolts, no-frills reporter. I honestly don't ever remember him writing a single player feature, in the sense of writing about a player's life, interviewing a player's family, etc. There's a place for that. That wasn't McGinn's place. His place was in the guts of the game. On a day-to-day basis during the season, he had an incredible way of bringing the thoughts of scouts and personnel guys into the laps of fans. His reporting was as dogged as it gets. He was a true "source guy." I'll be no NFL beat guy had more sources than McGinn.

He'd often said that the way he approached reporting on the Packers changed when Ron Wolf arrived as GM. When he started the beat in the mid-80s, the Packers were horrible. Basically a laughingstock. Then Wolf turned them into a Super Bowl champion, and McGinn always said it was the most unfathomable turnaround he'd ever seen. From then on, he said it was his goal not just to write about games and players, but about what it REALLY took to win in the NFL, how the guts of the game truly worked. And boy did he ever succeed. His Ultimate Super Bowl Book is like porn for diehard football fans and reporters, all at the same time.

He did it all with straightforward writing, too. He'd never spin a phrase like, say, vintage Rick Reilly. Sometimes his writing could best be described as "basic," but the amount of information he packed into a few paragraphs was more than some beat guys could get in a month. He could and would often be brutally critical, too, but you knew it was never a bullshirt hot-take, because he wouldn't write anything if he didn't both believe it and have loads of sources to formulate his beliefs.

From time to time, he'd pick up some spare work for the JS in a pinch. I remember a couple years ago he covered like a boys HS sectional basketball game. The forking story must've been 42 inches long. Nobody would ever get away with that, but he could. Even in a HS hoops gamer, the amount of information he had was absurd. And that was presumably on something he didn't have much knowledge of going into. The guy is a forking wizard.

I sure hope he continues to write. As for Gannett, continue to run off your hardest-working, most-talented, most-read staffers. Great business model. forkers.
Excellent post. Remarkable! But as we all know, his value to Gannett was nothing. Actually his value was negative. They had to dump him for some kid to make 30,000 if kid is lucky. Think of how many guys like this have been dumped throughout the country. My gosh, it'd be easier to count who is left. And the crazy thing is a guy this valuable is considered TOTALLY expendable by Gannett. They don't give a fork that he is THE expert on his sport. Bring in the kid who'll work for 28,000 and do all the videos and podcasts and write the short worthless stories that go in the paper. We'll work with he/she on the longer form stuff that we'll make him write as well. It's sickening. Like the one poster said, why don't the papers just totally pull the plug. No print edition, get rid of all reporters over 30 years old, hire stringer types out of college and see if the ad departments can sell anything for the online product. Instead ... nope. They continue to sell the print product to the boomers who have to have it, no matter how worthless it is. I almost think the boomers won't give up on their subscriptions until the day the crossword puzzles are deemed unnecessary.
 
They continue to sell the print product to the boomers who have to have it, no matter how worthless it is. I almost think the boomers won't give up on their subscriptions until the day the crossword puzzles are deemed unnecessary.
There's a good amount of truth in that, you know.
 
I think that is an old article. Gannett has more than 84 newspapers now, Connell hasn't been the spokesperson for a while and it hasn't traded at $21 for a long time.

That article is from when I was still with the company. Probably 2008 or 2009. Connell was promoted out of the spokesperson role right around the same time the ax fell on me.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top