• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Jason Whitlock really ticks me off

clutchcargo said:
Sgt. Bilco said:
Clearly, it's difficult, if not impossible, to determine if Clutch is, indeed, Whitlock. Frankly, I could hardly give a shirt, though if you are Whitlock, I am one of those who think your work is vastly overrated

Three reactions:

1. Yes, you do give a crap. If you didn't, you wouldn't be responding.
2. Just by participating in a callout of Whitlock on this thread, you are no better than the other minions here who persist in giving him the in-awe-of celebrity treatment---if he were to walk into a room occupied you, it would take you 15 minuets to work up the nerve to speak to him, and let's see yuo say to his face what is being said in here. He's one of your PEERS for cryin' out loud!! Treat him as such.
3. Overrated???!!! He gets paid very, very well for being overrated, and this obviously is not an industry that frivolously throws around big salaries and retention bonuses not paid to CEOs.

naw, chief. nobody here gives a shirt about that dumbass. his act grew old around here a long, long time ago. there only are so many self-inflicted blowjobs a person can administer in public before the act simply becomes tiresome.
 
I was planning on cleaning my car today, but with nothing else on my plate, I said screw it. I'll probably just sit around watching college basketball all day and clean my car tomorrow.

Wait. Which thread is this? I'm so confused.
 
clutchcargo said:
clutchcargo said:
Angola! said:
well at least clutch managed to not work his hatred for democrats into that strange post.

The night is young.

OK, I can't wait any longer. Hatred of Democrats? Not really--it's more a matter of simply not understanding liberals. They want George W. Bush tried for war crimes, but want to let blood-thirsty terrorists go scot-free. Now that makes a lot of sense.

Oops, sorry, got off track here. Forgot where I am. Journalism Topics?? Uh, well, that Whitlock guy is really a pompous ass. How's that. Am I back in the fold now?

You're not very good at life, are you?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top