• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

John Elway

Gehrig

Active Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2011
Messages
2,435
Location
Canada
We tend to accept it on faith that he was one of the all-time great QBs. His bulk stats attest to that:
#6 all-time in passing yards
#7 in passing TDs
#6 in completions
.641 career winning percentage
#4 in career wins for a QB

But looking at his efficiency numbers tells a different story. Obviously, comparing him to guys playing today is silly because of how much the game has changed, but even compared to his contemporaries, Elway rarely stood out in terms of efficiency.
In fact, throughout his career, the only times Elway led the league in any statistical category, it was for bulk totals (twice for attempts, once for completions and once for yards)

I compared his numbers in five efficiency categories (completion %, TD%, INT%, yards per attempt and passer rating) year-by-year to those of the median (I didn't use mean because it would be affected by outliers) qualifying QBs and found that, especially in the 80s and early 90s, Elway rarely did much better than the median in any of these categories and was frequently worse.
(Green indicates better than league median; Red indicates worse)

elway.png


Elway's efficiency numbers only remain consistently better than the league median only when Denver switches to the West Coast Offense with the arrival of Jim Fassel as the offensive coordinator in 1993 (the team would stick to that offensive system when Mike Shanahan takes over in '95), and as we all know, the WCO can make any quarterback look good. And even under those favorable conditions, Elway's numbers still lagged well behind other notable WCO quarterbacks like Steve Young, Brett Favre, Erik Kramer and Randall Cunningham.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gehrig said:
We tend to accept it on faith that he was one of the all-time great QBs. His bulk stats attest to that:
#6 all-time in passing yards
#7 in passing TDs
#6 in completions
.641 career winning percentage
#4 in career wins for a QB

But looking at his efficiency numbers tells a different story. Obviously, comparing him to guys playing today is silly because of how much the game has changed, but even compared to his contemporaries, Elway rarely stood out in terms of efficiency.
In fact, throughout his career, the only times Elway led the league in any statistical category, it was for bulk totals (twice for attempts, once for completions and once for yards)

I compared his numbers in five efficiency categories (completion %, TD%, INT%, yards per attempt and passer rating) year-by-year to those of the median (I didn't use mean because it would be affected by outliers) qualifying QBs and found that, especially in the 80s and early 90s, Elway rarely did much better than the median in any of these categories and was frequently worse.
(Green indicates better than league median; Red indicates worse)

elway.png


Elway's efficiency numbers only remain consistently better than the league median only when Denver switches to the West Coast Offense with the arrival of Jim Fassel as the offensive coordinator in 1993 (the team would stick to that offensive system when Mike Shanahan takes over in '95), and as we all know, the WCO can make any quarterback look good. And even under those favorable conditions, Elway's numbers still lagged well behind other notable WCO quarterbacks like Steve Young, Brett Favre, Erik Kramer and Randall Cunningham.

Someone enjoys cutting and pasting from other message boards.

http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=557236
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's only appropriate that Stephen Glass writes a story about Gehrig.
 
If there's a stat for carrying mediocre teams to the Super Bowl, Elway has to be No. 1.
 
Per "Gerhig"'s sig:

"He who is not courageous enough to cut and paste on message boards will accomplish nothing in life. "
 
Mr. Sunshine said:
If there's a stat for carrying mediocre teams to the Super Bowl, Elway has to be No. 1.

I'm not accepting on faith that one bit of those stats provided are correct.
 
1. A paranoid, conservative head coach for almost his entire prime? Check.
2. Garbage ass wide receivers and running backs who disappeared the minute they tried to go elsewhere? Check.
3. A franchise that thought it was wise to spend a first round pick on Tommy Maddux in his prime? Check.

Get back to me on how we measure these statistically, please.
 
Double Down said:
1. A paranoid, conservative head coach for almost his entire prime? Check.
2. Garbage ass wide receivers and running backs who disappeared the minute they tried to go elsewhere? Check.
3. A franchise that thought it was wise to spend a first round pick on Tommy Maddux in his prime? Check.

Get back to me on how we measure these statistically, please.

I was never even an Elway guy. But right on.

Is this where we get the proliferation of "Who was better, Steve Grogan or John Elway" threads?
 
The Big Ragu said:
Double Down said:
1. A paranoid, conservative head coach for almost his entire prime? Check.
2. Garbage ass wide receivers and running backs who disappeared the minute they tried to go elsewhere? Check.
3. A franchise that thought it was wise to spend a first round pick on Tommy Maddux in his prime? Check.

Get back to me on how we measure these statistically, please.

I was never even an Elway guy. But right on.

Is this where we get the proliferation of "Who was better, Steve Grogan or John Elway" threads?

Any mention of Steve Grogan reminds me of watching Patriots-Dolphins on Monday Night Football as a young lad.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top