STLIrish said:
jps said:
and fewer are in position to do so. hoppes already has the position, he's got a platform and he's got his talking points.
And that's the problem, isn't it. The people who are in position to lead us out of this seem incapable, or unwilling, to do so.
Of course, maybe they're only in position in our eyes, as anyone in a newsroom is quite expendable to those who write the checks. And maybe that's really the problem. A Lynn Hoppes sticks his neck out and the head gets chopped off.
Standing idly by while that happens to others doesn't keep you at even, though. It earns your professional pride and your soul some major demerits. Let the Hessians drag one poor schmuck kicking and screaming out of the room, then pretend that those of you left behind haven't lost a little something.
Taking a stand by resigning is a nice step, so bravo to the John Carrolls, Dean Baquets and Anne Marie Lipinskis. But taking a stand by going back strong at those who write the checks, to the point where they "resign" you, might bring more of the madness into the light. (Even now, in many cases, they're just not making as much money as they're accustomed to making. The ones really in trouble are the ones who borrowed recklessly to buy these profit machines in the first place.)
Failing all of the above, well, try not to give empty atta-boy speeches to people who are already dead, bleeding or suffering shell shock.