• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Marty Brennaman makes gay slur (or am I reading too much into this?)

McNuggetsMan

Active Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
817
Location
Maplewood, NJ
While speaking at a Marshall baseball fundraiser, the Reds announcer said:

On Saturday night during Marshall University's preseason baseball banquet and fundraiser at the Cam Henderson Center, Brennaman - the keynote speaker - determined that Marshall's president must be "queer" for softball since the university managed to open a $2.5 million softball facility in March 2008, but baseball is still traveling for home games.

http://www.dailymail.com/Sports/RichStevens/201102070063?page=1&build=cache

Did he make a gay slur or am I over reading this?
 
Sometimes you need to take the person's age into consideration and cut them some slack.

Even if he did mean it exactly as he said it, is it really bad enough to get worked up over? People are so goddamned sensitive these days, sometimes it's better just to roll your eyes and let it go.
 
He didn't make any kinda slur.

"Queer for something" is a colloquialism (probably anachronistic) meaning someone really likes something.
 
But some idiot will call one of the local gay groups find out how offended they are and apologies will be issued and jobs can be lost.

Sometimes people need to take a step back, decide how bad what the person said is and then realize while it wasn't the ideal choice of words, it's also not worth making an issue over.
 
at least he didn't say the president was "queer for softball" because he was being niggardly with his baseball funds.
 
He's queer for the softball team, which is played by a bunch of nappy-headed hopes.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Sometimes you need to take the person's age into consideration and cut them some slack.

Even if he did mean it exactly as he said it, is it really bad enough to get worked up over? People are so goddamned sensitive these days, sometimes it's better just to roll your eyes and let it go.

Helen Thomas agrees.
 
Responses like this are why I stay in journalism. I'm getting too old to clean up my sense of humor to sell real estate or teach.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top