Murray Chass is back

[JC]

That's more words than all my posts combined

That's more words than all of Ragu's posts combined. Sweet Jesus.

Impossible.

 

[Frank_Ridgeway]

He may be out of his mind with grief, but it's stupid for Mr. Scott Newman to get in the middle of the Chass-Jolly thing. Whether Chass has a point is probably something only Chass and Jolly would know for sure. All kinds of things happen in business, nothing would surprise me.

 

[Boom_70]

He may be out of his mind with grief, but it's stupid for Mr. Scott Newman to get in the middle of the Chass-Jolly thing. Whether Chass has a point is probably something only Chass and Jolly would know for sure. All kinds of things happen in business, nothing would surprise me.

Only surpassed by the stupidity of Murray using his new column to fight a personal battle.

 

[Frank_Ridgeway]

He may be out of his mind with grief, but it's stupid for Mr. Scott Newman to get in the middle of the Chass-Jolly thing. Whether Chass has a point is probably something only Chass and Jolly would know for sure. All kinds of things happen in business, nothing would surprise me.

Only surpassed by the stupidity of Murray using his new column to fight a personal battle.

It appears from the column that the two of them have a professional difference of opinion on the value of notes columns. That's fair game, and it appears Chass gave Jolly the chance to comment and printed that comment. It may well be personal, too, but the only indication I see of that is Mr. Scott Newman's post, and I'm not sure he would be a credible source on that. Chass could have chosen not to comment at all, but his column appears to be as fair as something like that could be. Not everyone would have sought comment. The guy consistently presents both sides of an argument -- that's something I've never seen you do here.

 

[Boom_70]

He may be out of his mind with grief, but it's stupid for Mr. Scott Newman to get in the middle of the Chass-Jolly thing. Whether Chass has a point is probably something only Chass and Jolly would know for sure. All kinds of things happen in business, nothing would surprise me.

Only surpassed by the stupidity of Murray using his new column to fight a personal battle.

It appears from the column that the two of them have a professional difference of opinion on the value of notes columns. That's fair game, and it appears Chass gave Jolly the chance to comment and printed that comment. It may well be personal, too, but the only indication I see of that is Mr. Scott Newman's post, and I'm not sure he would be a credible source on that. Chass could have chosen not to comment at all, but his column appears to be as fair as something like that could be. Not everyone would have sought comment. The guy consistently presents both sides of an argument -- that's something I've never seen you do here.

I prefer to present my opinion. I'm not much of a middle of the road guy.

As far as Murray's Sunday column. I felt is was lacking as compared to other Sunday baseball columns I've read over the years. Thankfully I guess that Tom Jolly shared my opinion. The new Sunday notes called "Bat's" has been a wonderful informative addition to the sports section.

 

[cranberry]

He may be out of his mind with grief, but it's stupid for Mr. Scott Newman to get in the middle of the Chass-Jolly thing. Whether Chass has a point is probably something only Chass and Jolly would know for sure. All kinds of things happen in business, nothing would surprise me.

Only surpassed by the stupidity of Murray using his new column to fight a personal battle.

Well, I have to agree with you, there.