Pilot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2006
- Messages
- 4,023
I am surprised there is still a full-time radio reporter in your market. Before the Reagan FCC there was a licensing requirement that radio stations had to offer news. Stations would run a newscast every hour. However the FCC eliminated that requirement and radio newsmen soon went the way of the dinosaurs. I read that Denver was down to one radio newsman, exclusive of the anchors on the KOA morning news black.
I also think that you need to define local paper. Where is the paper being printed? Newspapers are frequently being printed hundreds of miles away. Local staff will be skeletal. Can such a product still be called local?
Eh, she does some anchoring too, I guess? Or hosting of some music blocks. Not sure. Not a radio guy, if you can't tell! It's frankly impressive how everpresent she's made herself, but I'm not sure what the endgame is, besides making the paper look stupid on a daily basis. The paper's approach left an opening and she's filled it, but again, it seems like a heck of a lot of work and driving and events for what mostly amounts to unmonitized Facebook posts.
As for the paper, printed 3 hours away for the past 8-9 years, owned out of state for the last 2-3. Surely deadlines are a big factor in what makes it in print the next day, but, they really need an editor who can pound the desk and say "I don't care what you're doing! Get me the story ASAP!" and not "Eh, yeah, I guess it's fine to hold it another day."
I've had both. Both benefitted my career in certain ways, but when you go too long without the former, that urgency can really bleed out of a newsroom to the point where the "news" part of "newspaper" doesn't even fit.