Michael_ Gee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2004
- Messages
- 38,133
An ex post facto fine for a rules violation NOT called by the officials on the field stinks out loud no matter what the rule.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
bigpern23 said:Michael_ Gee said:Does anyone doubt that if that hit was on Matt Cassel or Luke McCown instead of Brady, there's no fine? The NFL WANTS its officiating to be as biased and borderline crooked as NBA officiating.
In fairness, it was an illegal hit. Dispute the rule if you like (IIRC, he was blocked from behind and hit Brady as he fell. What's he supposed to do?), but that hit was on the knee which is clearly illegal.
Herbert Anchovy said:Nice to see some of you guys coming around, meeting those on the distant shore of reality.
The officiating in the league is a balls-up fiasco, and has been for many years.
Herbert Anchovy said:This happened a few years ago when Brady was breathed on wrong by Terrell Suggs. The problem hasn't gone away.
The rules are being interpreted differently by different crews. There is no excuse for this distribution.
![]()
And a bad commissioner does nothing about it, only choosing to go after a peon like Dunta Robinson.
outofplace said:Again, big damn difference between questionable competence and intentionally changing the way games turn out.
The former is a legitimate discussion. The latter is tinfoil hat territory.
RickStain said:That's a fantastic example of how to mislead with a bar graph by setting the bottom axis arbitrarily.