BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2015
- Messages
- 7,269
What if Darnold is Steve Beuerlein?
Then he looks pretty forking good for being 59 years old!
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What if Darnold is Steve Beuerlein?
I'm not saying he sucks. I'm not advocating for one way or the other. There's certainly a good case for paying him. There's also a good case for letting him go and handing the reins to McCarthy. Remember, Carson Wentz once looked like an MVP.
What if Darnold is Steve Beuerlein?
Back in the day a middling show could attract 20 percent of the TV audience. Of course back then, you had three networks, cable was just getting going in the 80s. Now? A Tuesday network sitcom isn't just competing with literally 100s of networks available around the world for eyeballs, they are competing with every movie and TV show ever made for eyeballs given the new media eco-system.
... acknowledging the truth...if a team doesn't have a QB who is elite every week, it's probably not winning the Super Bowl.
As a lifelong Vikings fan, I feel obligated to weigh in. Here's the argument for keeping Darnold, IMO:He has a history. He was bad far longer than he's been good.
No one says Darnold should be banished from the league. But the Vikings used a top 10 overall draft choice on a QB they obviously think can be a success in the league, and the clock is ticking on McCarthy's bargain rookie contract. The franchise tag for QBs in 2024 was $38 million, and Over The Cap is projecting it will be $41 million this year. McCarthy's cap number for '25 is right around $5 million. What kind of talent could you add or keep with that difference?
If you believe McCarthy can give you similar results, it's only logical that's the way to go.
You're gambling if you throw $40-plus million (or $100 million-plus if you sign him long-term) at Darnold and ashume he can take you to the promised land (or close). It's a gamble if you let him walk and pin your hopes on a virtual rookie. Which gamble has better odds?
Darnold is going to play. Someone is going to sign him. But does it make sense for Minnesota to be that team? That's the question the Vikes have to answer.
Sure, but when you tag someone, you are committing to $35 to $40m for a QB who may not start for you. The Cleveland Browns are getting roasted for having to pay Watson $46m to maybe not be their starter next year. The Falcons will pay Cousins $27m to definitely not play for them (its funny how much heat the Falcons took for drafting Penix).
And yeah, I'm a Raider fan so I'm resigned to the idea than one of them will end up in the Silver and Black next year - or Rodgers. I'd take McCarthy from the Vikes as well. Any other second-hand or pre-owned QBs out there worth a darn?