• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NYT: ESPN pulled out of concussion doc project due to NFL pressure

Steak Snabler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
24,628
Hardly surprising, but disheartening all the same ...

"Frontline," the PBS public affairs series, and ESPN had been working for 15 months on a two-part documentary, to be televised in October. But ESPN's role came under intense pressure by the league, the two people said, after a trailer for the documentary was released Aug. 6, the day that the project was discussed at a Television Critics Association event in Beverly Hills, Calif.

Last week, several high-ranking officials convened a lunch meeting at Patroon, near the league's Midtown Manhattan headquarters, according to the two people, who requested anonymity because they were prohibited by their superiors from discussing the matter publicly. It was a table for four: Roger Goodell, commissioner of the N.F.L.; Steve Bornstein, president of the NFL Network; ESPN's president, John Skipper; and John Wildhack, ESPN's executive vice president for production.

At the combative meeting, the people said, league officials conveyed their displeasure with the direction of the documentary, which is expected to describe a narrative that has been captured in various news reports over the past decade: the league turning a blind eye to evidence that players were sustaining brain trauma on the field that could lead to profound, long-term cognitive disability.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/sports/football/nfl-pressure-said-to-prompt-espn-to-quit-film-project.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0
 
No shock at all here...

We saw how ESPN swept the NBA gambling scandal under the rug and I'm hardly surprised for a second to see this.
 
Agreed, no shock. Been down this road before -- Playmakers -- though this is far, far more serious.
 
Well, the program will get broadcast. And it will get covered. And ESPN will have to decide if and if so how it will cover the program. As a matter of pure business, they're making a mistake. I'd be astonished if the NFL ever got rid of a rights holder for any reason besides said rights holder not paying them enough.
 
Michael_ Gee said:
I'd be astonished if the NFL ever got rid of a rights holder for any reason besides said rights holder not paying them enough.

This is what I think too.

And, the opposite has been proven time and again. The best, most loyal media partner will be dropped in a second for an additional dollar.
 
I hope all those beat writers ESPN just hired know what they're getting into. I figure this serves as a good orientation.
 
The cat's out of the bag, NFL, so no sense trying to sweep this under the rug. Though I get the feeling I'm just beating a dead horse by saying that.
 
LongTimeListener said:
I hope all those beat writers ESPN just hired know what they're getting into. I figure this serves as a good orientation.

I don't think any of them had the notion that they were going to be covering anything controversial.
 
If appears there's a mentality in Bristol much like that at the Podunk Press when the wife of the biggest advertiser is thrown in the drunk tank and Mr. Advertiser "asks" the publisher to cover it up.
 
Statement!

http://espnmediazone.com/us/press-releases/2013/08/statement/
 
Back
Top